Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37409470›Full record

ArticleExperimental aging research

Age-Related Differences in Framing Selective Memory in Terms of Gains and Losses.

Dillon H Murphy, Alan D Castel, Barbara J Knowlton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental aging research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dillon H MurphyDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5604-3494
Alan D CastelDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1965-8227
Barbara J KnowltonDepartment of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1532-5081

Funding

Goals and Motivation to Remember Important Information in Old AgeR01AG044335 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CASTEL, ALAN D · 2013 to 2025
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined whether framing younger and older adults learning goals in terms of maximizing gains or minimizing losses impacts their ability to selectively remember high-value information. Specifically, we presented younger and older adults with lists of words paired with point values and participants were either told that they would receive the value associated with each word if they recalled it on a test or that they would lose the points associated with each word if they failed to recall it on the test. We also asked participants to predict the likelihood of recalling each word to determine if younger and older adults were metacognitively aware of any potential framing effects. Results revealed that older adults expected to be more selective when their goals were framed in terms of losses, but younger adults expected to be more selective when their goals were framed in terms of gains. However, this was not the case as both younger and older adults were more selective for high-value information when their goals were framed in terms of maximizing gains compared with minimizing losses. Thus, the framing of learning goals can impact metacognitive decisions and subsequent memory in both younger and older adults.

Indexed as

AgingMental RecallAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleGoalsHumansLearningMaleMemoryMetacognitionMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID37409470
PMCPMC10770296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.