Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37409339›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2023

Towards NHS Zero: greener gastroenterology and the impact of virtual clinics on carbon emissions and patient outcomes. A multisite, observational, cross-sectional study.

Jonathan King, Stephanie X Poo, Ahmed El-Sayed, Misha Kabir, George Hiner, Olaolu Olabinan, Michael Colwill, Homira Ayubi, GLINT Research Network, Eathar Shakweh and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan KingDepartment of Gastroenterology, Whittington Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8489-0677
Stephanie X PooDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ahmed El-SayedDepartment of Gastroenterology, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5704-7470
Misha KabirDepartment of Gastroenterology, Univeristy College Londn Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3991-1015
George HinerDepartment of Gastroenterology, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9276-4555
Olaolu OlabinanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Worthing, UK.
Michael ColwillDepartment of Gastroenterology, Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6925-8358
Homira AyubiDepartment of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
GLINT Research Network
Eathar ShakwehDepartment of Gastroenterology, Chelsea and Westminster Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Victoria T KronstenInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Rawen KaderDivision of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Bu'Hussain HayeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1670-8815
King's College Hospital · GBLondon North West Healthcare NHS Trust · GBCroydon University Hospital · GBHammersmith Hospital · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GBWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences · GBWhittington Health NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The National Health Service (NHS) produces more carbon emissions than any public sector organisation in England. In 2020, it became the first health service worldwide to commit to becoming carbon net zero, the same year as the COVID-19 pandemic forced healthcare systems globally to rapidly adapt service delivery. As part of this, outpatient appointments became largely remote. Although the environmental benefit of this change may seem intuitive the impact on patient outcomes must remain a priority. Previous studies have evaluated the impact of telemedicine on emission reduction and patient outcomes but never before in the gastroenterology outpatient setting. Method: 2140 appointments from general gastroenterology clinics across 11 Trusts were retrospectively analysed prior to and during the pandemic. 100 consecutive appointments during two periods of time, from 1 June 2019 (prepandemic) to 1 June 2020 (during the pandemic), were used. Patients were telephoned to confirm the mode of transport used to attend their appointment and electronic patient records reviewed to assess did-not-attend (DNA) rates, 90-day admission rates and 90-day mortality rates. Results: Remote consultations greatly reduced the carbon emissions associated with each appointment. Although more patients DNA their remote consultations and doctors more frequently requested follow-up blood tests when reviewing patients face-to-face, there was no significant difference in patient 90-day admissions or mortality when consultations were remote. Conclusion: Teleconsultations can provide patients with a flexible and safe means of being reviewed in outpatient clinics while simultaneously having a major impact on the reduction of carbon emissions created by the NHS.

Indexed as

AUDITCOVID-19ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTHHEALTH SERVICE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID37409339
PMCPMC11138175
OpenAlexW4309070790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.