Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37409334›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2023

Satellite liver transplant centres significantly improve transplant assessment outcomes for patients with chronic liver disease but not hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Oliver D Tavabie, Victoria T Kronsten, Robert Przemioslo, Neil McDougall, Katie Ramos, Deepak Joshi, Andreas Prachalias, Krish Menon, Kosh Agarwal, Michael A Heneghan and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Oliver D TavabieInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4693-6632
Victoria T KronstenInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Robert PrzemiosloDepartment of Gastroenterology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Neil McDougallThe Liver Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Katie RamosSouth West Liver Unit, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Deepak JoshiInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9547-2809
Andreas PrachaliasInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Krish MenonInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Kosh AgarwalInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Michael A HeneghanInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5441-9064
Talal VallianiDepartment of Gastroenterology, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
Johnny CashThe Liver Unit, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Matthew E CrampSouth West Liver Unit, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Varuna AluvihareInstitute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
King's College Hospital · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBPlymouth Hospital · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Liver transplantation (LT) remains integral to the management of end-stage chronic liver disease (CLD). However, referral thresholds and assessment pathways remain poorly defined. Distance from LT centre has been demonstrated to impact negatively on patient outcomes resulting in the development of satellite LT centres (SLTCs). We aimed to evaluate the impact of SLTCs on LT assessment in patients with CLD and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken including all patients with CLD or HCC assessed for LT at King's College Hospital (KCH) between October 2014 and October 2019. Referral location, social, demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected. Univariable and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to assess the impact of SLTCs on patients being accepted as LT candidates and contraindications being identified. Results: 1102 and 240 LT assessments were included for patients with CLD and HCC, respectively. MVA demonstrated significant associations with; patients living greater than 60 min from KCH/SLTCs and LT candidacy acceptance in CLD, and less deprived patients and LT candidacy acceptance in HCC. However, neither variable was associated with identification of LT contraindications. MVA demonstrated that referrals from SLTCs were more likely to result in acceptance of LT candidacy and less likely to result in a contraindication being identified in CLD. However, such associations were not demonstrated in HCC. Conclusion: SLTCs improve LT assessment outcomes in CLD but not HCC reflecting the standardised HCC referral pathway. Developing a formal regional LT assessment pathway across the UK would improve equity of access to transplantation.

Indexed as

alcoholic liver diseasecirrhosishealth service researchhepatocellular carcinomaliver transplantation

Identifiers

PMID37409334
PMCPMC11138172
OpenAlexW4317390064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.