Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37409324›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Methods primers2022

Volume electron microscopy.

Christopher J Peddie, Christel Genoud, Anna Kreshuk, Kimberly Meechan, Kristina D Micheva, Kedar Narayan, Constantin Pape, Robert G Parton, Nicole L Schieber, Yannick Schwab and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Methods primers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Endothelial Continuum and Capillary Specialization in Pulmonary Vascular Development.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. 3D Reconstruction of MatureBio-protocol · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Christopher J PeddieElectron Microscopy Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Christel GenoudElectron Microscopy Facility, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Anna KreshukCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kimberly MeechanCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kristina D MichevaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Kedar NarayanCenter for Molecular Microscopy, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Constantin PapeCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Robert G PartonThe Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Nicole L SchieberCentre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Yannick SchwabCell Biology and Biophysics Unit/ Electron Microscopy Core Facility, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Benjamin TitzeNanosurf AG, Liestal, Switzerland.
Paul VerkadeSchool of Biochemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Aubrey AubreyJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA.
Lucy M CollinsonElectron Microscopy Science Technology Platform, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.

Funding

WORK ORDER 126643 B539 EXPAND IC SUITE75N91019D00024 · NIAID · LEIDOS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, INC. · PI BRISCOE, LYNN · 2019 to 2025
$3932.6M
Axonal myelination of interneurons in cortex: functional significance and plasticityR01NS094499 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MADISON, VERNON DANIEL · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
Axonal myelination of interneurons in cortex: functional significance and plasticityR56NS094499 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MADISON, VERNON DANIEL · 2022 to 2022
$551k
Medical Research Council FC001999NCI NIH HHS 75N91019D00024NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094499NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS094499Wellcome Trust FC001999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life exists in three dimensions, but until the turn of the century most electron microscopy methods provided only 2D image data. Recently, electron microscopy techniques capable of delving deep into the structure of cells and tissues have emerged, collectively called volume electron microscopy (vEM). Developments in vEM have been dubbed a quiet revolution as the field evolved from established transmission and scanning electron microscopy techniques, so early publications largely focused on the bioscience applications rather than the underlying technological breakthroughs. However, with an explosion in the uptake of vEM across the biosciences and fast-paced advances in volume, resolution, throughput and ease of use, it is timely to introduce the field to new audiences. In this Primer, we introduce the different vEM imaging modalities, the specialized sample processing and image analysis pipelines that accompany each modality and the types of information revealed in the data. We showcase key applications in the biosciences where vEM has helped make breakthrough discoveries and consider limitations and future directions. We aim to show new users how vEM can support discovery science in their own research fields and inspire broader uptake of the technology, finally allowing its full adoption into mainstream biological imaging.

Identifiers

PMID37409324
PMCPMC7614724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.