ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Serum creatinine/cystatin C ratio as a prognostic indicator for patients with colorectal cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prognostic value of creatinine-cystatin C ratio in individuals with cancer: a meta-analysis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Pretreatment creatinine-to-cystatin c ratio as a prognostic marker in digestive tract cancers: a meta-analysis with reconstructed individual patient data and trial sequential analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Sarcopenia defined by serum creatinine and cystatin C predicts poor survival outcomes in patients with cancers.BMC geriatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Development of multi-algorithm machine learning models integrating novel serum biomarkers for survival prediction in colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Serum creatinine to cystatin C ratio is a prognostic indicator in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Serum creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio and 1-year mortality risk in advanced breast cancer patients: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- The diagnostic performance of Cr/CysC for sarcopenia and its predictive value on clinical outcomes in hospitalized older patients: a prospective cohort study.European geriatric medicine · 2024Article
- Development of a haematological indices-based nomogram for prognostic prediction and immunotherapy response assessment in primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma patients.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Clinical implications and predictive value of the creatinine‑cystatin C ratio in patients with multiple myeloma and renal impairment.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Correlation between sarcopenia and esophageal cancer: a narrative review.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Review
- Creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio and body composition predict response to PD-1 inhibitors-based combination treatment in metastatic gastric cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to explore the relationship between creatinine/cystatin C ratio and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients undergoing surgical treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 975 CRC patients who underwent surgical resection from January 2012 to 2015. Restricted three-sample curve to display the non-linear relationship between PFS/OS and creatinine-cystatin C ratio. Cox regression model and Kaplan-Meier method were used to evaluate the effect of the creatinine-cystatin C ratio on the survival of CRC patients. Prognostic variables with p-value ≤0.05 in multivariate analysis were used to construct prognostic nomograms. The receiver operator characteristic curve was used to compare the efficacy of prognostic nomograms and the traditional pathological stage. Results: There was a negative linear relationship between creatinine/cystatin C ratio and adverse PFS in CRC patients. Patients with low creatinine/cystatin C ratio had significantly lower PFS/OS than those with high creatinine/cystatin C ratio (PFS, 50.8% vs. 63.9%, p = 0.002; OS, 52.5% vs. 68.9%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that low creatinine/cystatin C ratio was an independent risk factor for PFS (HR=1.286, 95%CI = 1.007-1.642, p=0.044) and OS (HR=1.410, 95%CI=1.087-1.829, p=0.010) of CRC patients. The creatinine/cystatin C ratio-based prognostic nomograms have good predictive performance, with a concordance index above 0.7, which can predict the 1-5-year prognosis. Conclusion: Creatinine/cystatin C ratio may be an effective prognostic marker for predicting PFS and OS in CRC patients, aid in pathological staging, and along with tumour markers help in-depth prognostic stratification in CRC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.