Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37409248›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

The hydrophilic extract from a new tomato genotype (named DHO) kills cancer cell lines through the modulation of the DNA damage response induced by Campthotecin treatment.

Daniela Barone, Carmelina Antonella Iannuzzi, Iris Maria Forte, Maria Carmen Ragosta, Maria Cuomo, Milena Dell'Aquila, Angela Altieri, Antonella Caporaso, Rosa Camerlingo, Maria Manuela Rigano and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniela BaroneCell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS)-Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Carmelina Antonella IannuzziCell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS)-Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Iris Maria ForteCell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS)-Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Maria Carmen RagostaDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena and Istituto Toscana Tumori (ITT), Siena, Italy.
Maria CuomoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena and Istituto Toscana Tumori (ITT), Siena, Italy.
Milena Dell'AquilaDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena and Istituto Toscana Tumori (ITT), Siena, Italy.
Angela AltieriDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena and Istituto Toscana Tumori (ITT), Siena, Italy.
Antonella CaporasoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena and Istituto Toscana Tumori (ITT), Siena, Italy.
Rosa CamerlingoCell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS)-Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Maria Manuela RiganoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Daria Maria MontiDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Amalia BaroneDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Paola ImbimboDepartment of Chemical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Luigi FruscianteDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Marcellino MondaUnit of Dietetics and Sports Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Margherita D'AngeloUnit of Dietetics and Sports Medicine, Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Michelino De LaurentiisDepartment of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Antonio GiordanoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena and Istituto Toscana Tumori (ITT), Siena, Italy.
Luigi AlfanoCell Biology and Biotherapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS)-Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITUniversity of Siena · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: DNA double-strand breaks are the most toxic lesions repaired through the non-homologous and joining (NHEJ) or the homologous recombination (HR), which is dependent on the generation of single-strand tails, by the DNA end resection mechanism. The resolution of the HR intermediates leads to error-free repair (Gene Conversion) or the mutagenic pathways (Single Strand Annealing and Alternative End-Joining); the regulation of processes leading to the resolution of the HR intermediates is not fully understood. Methods: Here, we used a hydrophilic extract of a new tomato genotype (named DHO) in order to modulate the Camptothecin (CPT) DNA damage response. Results: We demonstrated increased phosphorylation of Replication Protein A 32 Serine 4/8 (RPA32 S4/8) protein in HeLa cells treated with the CPT in combination with DHO extract with respect to CPT alone. Moreover, we pointed out a change in HR intermediates resolution from Gene Conversion to Single Strand Annealing through the modified DNA repair protein RAD52 homolog (RAD52), DNA excision repair protein ERCC-1 (ERCC1) chromatin loading in response to DHO extract, and CPT co-treatment, with respect to the vehicle. Finally, we showed an increased sensitivity of HeLa cell lines to DHO extract and CPT co-treatment suggesting a possible mechanism for increasing the efficiency of cancer therapy. Discussion: We described the potential role of DHO extract in the modulation of DNA repair, in response to Camptothecin treatment (CPT), favoring an increased sensitivity of HeLa cell lines to topoisomerase inhibitor therapy.

Indexed as

DNA damage responseDNA repairhomologous recombinationsingle strand annealingSolanum lycopersicum

Identifiers

PMID37409248
PMCPMC10318356
OpenAlexW4381334788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.