Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37409214›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Ultrafiltration in Heart Failure: A Review.

Himanshi Bisht, Apoorva Tripathi, Akshat Arya, Ashwati Konat, Divya Patel, Dhruvin Godhani, Rushi Kamaria, Parita Shah, Gayatri Chudasama, Pragya Jain and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Emerging Device Therapies for Cardiorenal Syndrome.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Himanshi BishtMedicine, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Apoorva TripathiMedicine, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Akshat AryaInternal Medicine, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Ashwati KonatDepartment of Zoology, Biomedical Technology and Human Genetics, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, IND.
Divya PatelInternal Medicine, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Dhruvin GodhaniInternal Medicine, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College, Gandhinagar, IND.
Rushi KamariaInternal Medicine, Government Medical College, Surat, IND.
Parita ShahInternal Medicine, Smt. Nathiba Hargovandas Lakhmichand (NHL) Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Gayatri ChudasamaInternal Medicine, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy (BJ) Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Pragya JainInternal Medicine, Smt. Nathiba Hargovandas Lakhmichand (NHL) Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, IND.
Kamal SharmaCardiology, Dr. Kamal Sharma Cardiology Clinic, Ahmedabad, IND.
B. J. Medical College & Sassoon Hospital · INIndus University · INGandhi Medical College · INGujarat University · INSmt. N.H.L. Municipal Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrafiltration is an effective method to get rid of fluid retention and congestion in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (HF) without affecting the circulating volume. Although its efficacy in comparison to diuretics is debatable, the evaluation of our analysis is based on various studies that comprise published clinical trials on ultrafiltration and studies comparing the efficacy of diuretics and ultrafiltration. Apart from this, we also look at literature that provides shortcomings of the said procedure and its scope for future advancements. Heart failure ultimately leads to volume overload, which is a highly concerning complication. Diuretics have been used as a first-line treatment for fluid overload but are becoming inefficacious due to the development of resistance and renal dysfunction. Ultrafiltration, on the other hand, is an attractive alternative to counter volume overload and congestion, which are unresponsive to medical therapy. There is also evidence that it significantly decreases the probability of future episodes of decompensation. There are, however, disagreements about whether ultrafiltration is an effective method to improve mortality in these patients. There is a lack of conclusive studies demonstrating the superiority of one fluid removal method over another. Hence, it is imperative to continue searching for the most effective method to treat congestion. Priority should be given to more mechanistic studies regarding ultrafiltration.

Indexed as

decompensationdiureticsfluid overloadheart failureultrafiltration

Identifiers

PMID37409214
PMCPMC10318566
OpenAlexW4379365483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.