Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37409104›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Investigation of the efficacy and safety of retinal inactivation as a treatment for amblyopia in cats.

Mairin Hogan, Nadia R DiCostanzo, Nathan A Crowder, Ming-Fai Fong, Kevin R Duffy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mairin HoganFaculty of Health, Clinical Vision Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Nadia R DiCostanzoFaculty of Health, Clinical Vision Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Nathan A CrowderDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Ming-Fai FongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Kevin R DuffyDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Dalhousie University · CAGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Controlling synaptic and intrinsic plasticity underlying visual cortical enhancementR00EY029326 · NEI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FONG, MING-FAI · 2022 to 2024
$747k
NEI NIH HHS R00 EY029326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Deprivation of normal vision early in postnatal development elicits modifications of neural circuitry within the primary visual pathway that can cause a severe and intractable vision impairment (amblyopia). In cats, amblyopia is often modeled with monocular deprivation (MD), a procedure that involves temporarily closing the lids of one eye. Following long-term MD, brief inactivation of the dominant eye's retina can promote recovery from the anatomical and physiological effects of MD. In consideration of retinal inactivation as a viable treatment for amblyopia it is imperative to compare its efficacy against conventional therapy, as well as assess the safety of its administration. Methods: In the current study we compared the respective efficacies of retinal inactivation and occlusion of the dominant eye (reverse occlusion) to elicit physiological recovery from a prior long-term MD in cats. Because deprivation of form vision has been associated with development of myopia, we also examined whether ocular axial length or refractive error were altered by a period of retinal inactivation. Results: The results of this study demonstrate that after a period of MD, inactivation of the dominant eye for up to 10 days elicited significant recovery of visually-evoked potentials that was superior to the recovery measured after a comparable duration of reverse occlusion. After monocular retinal inactivation, measurements of ocular axial length and refractive error were not significantly altered from their pre-inactivation values. The rate of body weight gain also was not changed during the period of inactivation, indicating that general well-being was not affected. Discussion: These results provide evidence that inactivation of the dominant eye after a period of amblyogenic rearing promotes better recovery than eye occlusion, and this recovery was achieved without development of form-deprivation myopia.

Indexed as

amblyopiaocular axial lengthplasticityrefractive errorretinal inactivationtetrodotoxinvisual cortexvisually-evoked potentials

Identifiers

PMID37409104
PMCPMC10319065
OpenAlexW4381435906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.