ArticleProstate international2023
Detection of recurrence sites using
Article in Prostate international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oncologic outcomes of salvage radiotherapy and lymphadenectomy for positron emission tomography-positive lymph nodes in biochemical recurrence: A systematic review to inform treatment decisions.Prostate international · 2025Review
- Prognostic Importance of Lymphovascular Invasion for Specific Subgroup of Patients with Prostate Cancer After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (The MSUG94 Group).Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Prostate-specific antigen doubling time predicts the efficacy of site-directed therapy for oligoprogressive castration-resistant prostate cancer.Prostate international · 2023Article
- Predictors of Outcomes in Patients With Clinically Lymph Node Positive Prostate Cancer After Definitive Radiotherapy.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The optimal condition for the clinical application of Methods: FCH-PET/CT was conducted in 89 patients diagnosed with PSA failure after radical treatment (radical prostatectomy in 75 and definitive radiotherapy in 14) between November 2018 and May 2021. Detection rates were examined via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors affecting positive FCH-PET/CT findings. We also conducted subgroup analyses according to the PSA failure patterns after the radical treatment (persistently high PSA [ Results: FCH-PET/CT demonstrated a 59.6% overall detection rate, and the optimal PSA threshold for detecting positive findings was ≥ 1.00 ng/mL at the time of imaging. On multivariable analysis, PSA > 1.00 ng/mL ( Conclusion: FCH-PET/CT is a clinically useful tool for detecting tumor recurrence sites in prostate cancer patients with PSA failure if PSA has exceeded a certain value at the time of imaging. Particularly, higher AUC values were observed when FCH-PET/CT was performed in patients with BCR after initial treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.