Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37409002›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2023

Comparison of Relaxometry Between Ulnar Nerve and Posterior Tibial Nerve After Cisatracurium Administration Using Electromyography.

Paweł Radkowski, Stefan Grond, Horst Brunner, Joanna Wolska, Justyna Dawidowska-Fidrych, Jakub Ruść, Katarzyna Podhorodecka

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Muscle-Specific Differences in Neuromuscular Block and Quantitative Neuromuscular Monitoring: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paweł RadkowskiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Stefan GrondDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Klinikum Lippe GmbH, Detmold, Germany.
Horst BrunnerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Heiligen Geist Hospital, Fritzlar, Germany.
Joanna WolskaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Justyna Dawidowska-FidrychPro-Medica Sp. z.o.o, Ełk, Poland.
Jakub RuśćDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Regional Specialist Hospital, Olsztyn, Poland.
Katarzyna PodhorodeckaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Regional Specialist Hospital, Olsztyn, Poland.
Hospital zum Heiligen Geist · DEUniversity of Computer Sciences and Economics in Olsztyn · PLKlinikum Lippe · DEUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Electromyography can be used for quantitative neuromuscular monitoring during general anesthesia, mostly using the stimulation train-of-four (TOF) pattern. Relaxometry measures the muscular response of the adductor pollicis muscle to electrical stimulation of the ulnar nerve, which is routinely used in clinical practices for monitoring the neuromuscular block. However, when it is not always possible to be used for all patients, the posterior tibial nerve is a suitable alternative. Objectives: Using electromyography, we compared the neuromuscular block between the ulnar and the posterior tibial nerves. Methods: In this study, the participants were 110 patients who met inclusion criteria and submitted their written consent. Following the administration of cisatracurium intravenously, the patients had relaxometry performed simultaneously on the ulnar and the posterior tibial nerves using electromyography. Results: Eighty-seven patients were included in the final analysis. The onset time was 296 ± 99 s at the ulnar nerve and 346 ± 146 s at the tibial nerve, with a mean difference of -50 s and a standard deviation of 164 s. The 95% limits of agreement ranged from -372 s to 272 s. The relaxation time was 105 ± 26 min at the ulnar nerve and 87 ± 25 min at the tibial nerve, with a mean difference of 18 min and a standard deviation of 20 min. Conclusions: Using electromyography, no statistically significant difference was noticed between the ulnar and the posterior tibial nerve during the neuromuscular block. The onset time and the relaxation time assessed with an electromyogram to compare the stimulation of the ulnar and posterior tibial nerves showed large limits of agreement.

Indexed as

CisatracuriumElectromyographyNeuromuscular MonitoringPosterior Tibial NerveTrain-of-four (TOF) MonitoringUlnar Nerve

Identifiers

PMID37409002
PMCPMC10319045
OpenAlexW4318426316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.