Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37408951›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2023

Breast cancer survival in Mexico between 2007 and 2016 in women without social security: a retrospective cohort study.

Karla Unger-Saldaña, Antonio Bandala-Jacques, Rodrigo Huerta-Gutierrez, Salvador Zamora-Muñoz, Juan Eugenio Hernández-Ávila, Paula Cabrera-Galeana, Alejandro Mohar, Martin Lajous

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Karla Unger-SaldañaCONACYT Researcher, National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.
Antonio Bandala-JacquesCenter for Research on Population Health, National Institute of Public Health, Mexico City, Mexico.
Rodrigo Huerta-GutierrezInstitute of Public Health and Center for Stroke Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Salvador Zamora-MuñozFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Juan Eugenio Hernández-ÁvilaCentro de Investigación en Evaluación y Encuestas (CIEE), Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Mexico.
Paula Cabrera-GaleanaBreast Medical Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Mexico.
Alejandro MoharInstituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) and National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.
Martin LajousCenter for Research on Population Health, National Institute of Public Health, Mexico City, Mexico.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHarvard Global Health Institute · USInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Essential indicators of health system performance for breast cancer are lacking in Mexico. We estimated survival and clinical stage distribution for women without social insurance who were treated under a health financing scheme that covered 60% of the Mexican population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study cross-linking reimbursement claims for 56,847 women treated for breast cancer between 2007 and 2016 to a mortality registry. We estimated overall- and clinical stage-specific survival and breast cancer survival according to patient age, state of residence, marginalization, type of treatment facility, and patient volume of the treatment facility. We also explored the distribution of clinical stage according to age, year of treatment initiation, and state where the woman was treated. We used log-rank tests and estimated 95% CIs to compare differences between patient groups. Findings: Median age was 52 years (interquartile range [IQR] 45, 61) (Sixty five percent patients (36,731/56,847) had advanced disease at treatment initiation. Five-year overall survival was 72.2% (95% CI 71.7, 72.6). For early disease (excluding stage 0), 5-year overall survival was 89.0% (95% CI 88.4, 89.5), for locally advanced disease 69.9% (95% CI 69.0, 70.2) and for metastatic 36.9% (95% CI 35.4, 38.4). Clinical stage at treatment initiation and breast cancer survival remained unchanged in the period analyzed. Clinical stage and survival differed across age groups, state of residence, and type of facility where women received treatment. Interpretation: In the absence of population-based cancer registries, medical claims data may be efficiently leveraged to estimate essential cancer-related performance indicators. Funding: The authors received no financial support for this research.

Indexed as

Breast cancerClinical stageMexicoSeguro popularSurvival

Identifiers

PMID37408951
PMCPMC10319338
OpenAlexW4381989285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.