Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37408715›Full record

ArticleJournal of health monitoring2023

What is the health status of girls and boys in the COVID-19 pandemic? Selected results of the KIDA study.

Julika Loss, Miriam Blume, Laura Neuperdt, Nadine Flerlage, Tim Weihrauch, Kristin Manz, Roma Thamm, Christina Poethko-Müller, Elvira Mauz, Petra Rattay and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julika LossRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Miriam BlumeRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Laura NeuperdtRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Nadine FlerlageRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Tim WeihrauchRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Kristin ManzRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Roma ThammRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Christina Poethko-MüllerRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Elvira MauzRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Petra RattayRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Jennifer AllenRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Mira TschornRobert Koch Institute, Berlin Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring.
Robert Koch Institute · DEUniversity of Potsdam · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It is well known that there are gender differences in the health behaviour and physical and mental health of children. The COVID-19 pandemic influenced the health and lifestyles of children and adolescents by changing their living conditions. The present work investigates whether gender differences in selected health indicators are evident more than two years after the onset of the pandemic. Methods: In the study Kindergesundheit in Deutschland aktuell (KIDA) (German Children's Health Update), cross-sectional telephone surveys were conducted with parents of 3- to 15-year-olds (n=3,478). Parental information on the general and mental health of the child, on increased need for health care and mental health services, as well as on physical activity and utilisation of sports activities were queried in standardised manner. Gender differences were assessed using Chi Results: A total of 91% of the girls and 92% of the boys had their general health assessed as being (very) good by their parents (difference not significant, n.s.). An increased need for care and support was indicated for 10.6% of the 3- to 15-year-olds (girls: 9%, boys: 12%, n.s.). Boys met the physical activity recommendations of the WHO significantly more often (60%) than girls (54%). Good to excellent mental health was reported for 93% of both boys and girls. When changes during the pandemic were reported, no differences were found in the responses for girls compared to boys. Conclusions: Gender differences were found for individual parameters and age groups. These differences must be assessed in the context of other social determinants of health, and need to be considered when planning preventive measures.

Indexed as

CHILD AND ADOLESCENT HEALTHCOVID-19 PANDEMICGENDERMENTAL HEALTHPHYSICAL ACTIVITY

Identifiers

PMID37408715
PMCPMC10318563
OpenAlexW4383301695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.