Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37408714›Full record

ArticleJournal of health monitoring2023

Childhood and adolescent cancer in Germany - an overview.

Claudia Spix, Friederike Erdmann, Desiree Grabow, Cécile Ronckers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Integration of Pediatric Palliative Care in Oncology: A Scoping Review.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia SpixGerman Childhood Cancer Registry Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz.
Friederike ErdmannGerman Childhood Cancer Registry Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz.
Desiree GrabowGerman Childhood Cancer Registry Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz.
Cécile RonckersGerman Childhood Cancer Registry Division of Childhood Cancer Epidemiology Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Childhood and adolescent cancer constitutes only a very small fraction of the cancer cases in Germany and throughout the world, but it is the most frequent cause of disease-related death in children. The diagnostic spectrum differs markedly from that of adults. More than 90% of all cases of childhood and adolescent cancer in Germany are treated according to centralised protocols or in therapy studies. Methods: The main epidemiological data for this group are collected by the German Childhood Cancer Registry (GCCR) since 1980. Based on this data, three typical diagnoses and their incidence and prognosis are described in exemplary manner: Lymphoid leukaemia (LL), astrocytoma and neuroblastoma. Results: Approximately 2,250 new cancers are diagnosed in children and adolescents under the age of 18 in Germany every year. In this age group, leukaemia and lymphoma account for almost 50% of all new cancer cases, predominately acute forms. Overall, the prognosis is considerably better than in adults. Conclusions: There is relatively little consistent evidence available on external factors as risk factors for childhood cancer, despite decades of research. For LL, the immune system and infections are assumed to play a role, as early training of the immune system appears to be protective. To an increasing degree, research is identifying genetic risk factors for many types of childhood and adolescent cancer. The therapy is sometimes very intensive and leads to a variety of late effects for at least 75% of the survivors, which may occur soon after the primary diagnosis, but also decades later.

Indexed as

ADOLESCENTSCANCERCHILDRENEPIDEMIOLOGYGERMANYLONG-TERM FOLLOW-UPPROGNOSIS

Identifiers

PMID37408714
PMCPMC10318562
OpenAlexW4383302465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.