Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37408681›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Targeted Intraoperative Radiation Therapy during Breast-Conserving Surgery for Patients with Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Phase II Single Center Prospective Trial.

Constanza Martinez, Sarkis Meterissian, Asma Saidi, Francine Tremblay, Ari N Meguerditchian, David Fleiszer, Christine Lambert, Marc David, Valerie Panet-Raymond, Bassam Abdulkarim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The evolution of targeted intra operative radiotherapy in early breast cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Constanza MartinezDivision of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Sarkis MeterissianDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Asma SaidiDivision of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Francine TremblayDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Ari N MeguerditchianDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
David FleiszerDepartment of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Christine LambertDivision of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Marc DavidDivision of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Valerie Panet-RaymondDivision of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Bassam AbdulkarimDivision of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Quebec, Canada.
Tarek HijalDivision of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Patients with early stage breast cancer (ESBC) are conventionally treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole-breast external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The emergence of targeted intraoperative radiation therapy (TARGIT) with Intrabeam has been used as a therapeutic alternative for patients with risk-adapted ESBC. Here we present our radiation therapy toxicities (RTT), postoperative complications (PC), and short-term outcomes of the prospective phase II trial at the McGill University Health Center. Methods and Materials: Patients aged ≥50 years with biopsy-proven hormone receptor-positive, grade 1 or 2, invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast, cT1N0, were eligible for the study. Enrolled patients underwent BCS followed by immediate TARGIT of 20 Gy in 1 fraction. Upon final pathology, patients with low-risk breast cancer (LRBC) received no further EBRT, and those with high-risk breast cancer (HRBC) received further 15 to 16 fractions of whole breast EBRT. HRBC criteria included pathologic tumor size >2 cm, grade 3, positive lympho-vascular invasion, multifocal disease, close margins (<2 mm), or positive nodal disease. Results: A total of 61 patients with ESBC were enrolled in the study; upon final pathology, 40 (65.6%) had LRBC, and 21 (34.4%) had HRBC. The median follow-up was 3.9 years. The most common HRBC criteria were close margins in 66.6% (n = 14) and lymphovascular invasion in 28.6% (n = 6). No grade 4 RTT were observed in either group. The most common PC were seroma and cellulitis for both groups. The rate of locoregional recurrence was 0% in both groups. The overall survival in LRBC was 97.5% and in HRBC 95.2% with no significant differences. Deaths were nonbreast cancer related. Conclusions: In patients with ESBC undergoing BCS, the use of TARGIT shows low rates of RTT and PC complications. Moreover, our short-term outcomes show no significant difference at 3.9 years median follow-up for locoregional recurrence or overall survival between groups of patients receiving TARGIT alone or TARGIT followed by EBRT. Of all patients, 34.4% required further EBRT, most commonly due to close margins.

Identifiers

PMID37408681
PMCPMC10318266
OpenAlexW4362722662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.