Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37408671›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Cancer Control, Toxicity, and Secondary Malignancy Risks of Proton Radiation Therapy for Stage I-IIB Testicular Seminoma.

Russell Maxwell, Yushi Chang, Christina Paul, David J Vaughn, John P Christodouleas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07601672 (PRISTINE Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07601672 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

PRISTINE Trial: PRoton Beam Therapy In Seminoma - Toxicity INvestigation and Evaluation of Outcome

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Clinico HumanitasRan2026 to 2031Enrolled20ConditionsSeminomaArmsprotontherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Russell MaxwellDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Yushi ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Christina PaulDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
David J VaughnDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
John P ChristodouleasDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study's objective was to report cancer control and toxicity outcomes after proton radiation therapy (RT) in testicular seminoma and to compare secondary malignancy (SMN) risks with photon-based treatment alternatives. Methods and Materials: Consecutive patients with stage I-IIB testicular seminoma treated with proton RT at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier estimates for disease-free and overall survival were computed. Toxicities were scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Photon comparison plans, including 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) and intensity modulated RT (IMRT)/volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), were created for each patient. Dosimetric parameters and SMN risk predictions for different in-field organs-at-risk were compared between the techniques. Excess absolute SMN risks were estimated with organ equivalent dose modeling. Results: Twenty-four patients were included (median age, 38.5 years). The majority of patients had stage II disease (IIA, 12 [50.0%]; IIB, 11 [45.8%]; IA, 1 [4.2%]). Seven (29.2%) and 17 (70.8%) patients had de novo and recurrent disease, respectively (de novo/recurrent: IA, 1/0; IIA, 4/8; IIB, 2/9). Most acute toxicities were mild (grade 1 [G1], 79.2%; G2, 12.5%) with G1 nausea being most common (70.8%). No serious events (G3-5) occurred. With a median follow-up time of 3 years (interquartile range, 2.1-3.6 years), 3-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 90.9% (95% confidence interval, 68.1%-97.6%) and 100% (95% confidence interval, 100%-100%), respectively. There were no documented late toxicities in the follow-up period, including worsening serial creatinine levels suggestive of early nephrotoxicity. Proton RT had significant reductions in mean organ-at-risk doses to the kidneys, stomach, colon, liver, bladder, and body compared with both 3D-CRT and IMRT/VMAT. Proton RT had significantly lower SMN risk predictions compared with 3D-CRT and IMRT/VMAT. Conclusions: Cancer control and toxicity outcomes using proton RT in stage I-IIB testicular seminoma are consistent with existing photon-based RT literature. However, proton RT may be associated with significantly lower SMN risks.

Identifiers

PMID37408671
PMCPMC10318216
OpenAlexW4367693528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.