ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
Video analysis of
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Video kinematics of an unloaded, ex-vivo beating heart can predict future loaded heart function.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025Article
- Unlocking cardiac motion: assessing software and machine learning for single-cell and cardioid kinematic insights.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on Machine Perfusion in Cardiothoracic Transplant.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Reliable biomarkers for assessing the viability of the donor hearts undergoing Methods: Healthy donor porcine hearts ( Results: There were no significant changes in any of the measured parameters of the heart on the OCS™ device over time as judged by linear regression analysis. Importantly, there were no significant changes in contractility during the duration of the preservation period (time 0-30 min, 918 ± 430 px/s; time 31-60 min, 1,386 ± 603 px/s; time 61-90 min, 1,299 ± 617 px/s; time 91-120 min, 1,535 ± 728 px/s). Similarly, there were no significant changes in the force, energy, or trajectory parameters. Post-transplantation echocardiograms demonstrated robust contractility of each allograft. Conclusion: Vi.Ki.E. assessment of the donor hearts undergoing
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.