ArticleResuscitation plus2023
In-situ simulation of CPR in the emergency department - A tool for continuous improvement of the initial resuscitation.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving surgical team confidence for intraoperative cardiac arrest in non-standard positions (sitting beach chair and prone): a prospective in-situ simulation study with three-month follow-up.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
- Mentors' perspectives on multidisciplinary in situ simulation teaching for new nurses: a qualitative SWOT analysis in a top-tier hospital in Central China.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- A practical study on a stepwise simulation intervention guided by video review to improve the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the pediatric emergency department.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of ultra-rapid (20 min) high-frequency in-situ cardiac arrest simulations in a high-volume operating department - A tool for evaluating and implementing emergency routines.Resuscitation plus · 2025Article
- Ten years of incident reports on in-hospital cardiac arrest - Are they useful for improvements?Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Enhancing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training: An Interprofessional Approach With Undergraduate Medicine and Nursing Students Using Self-Learning Methodology in Simulated Environments (MAES)-A Qualitative Study.Journal of nursing management · 2024Article
- Building an Adaptable Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Simulation Portfolio: Advancing Efficiency, Flexibility, and Team-based Training.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Simulating CPR scenarios in a clinical environment has been described as a method for mitigating latent safety threats. Therefore, we implemented regular inter-professional, multidisciplinary in-situ simulations in the emergency department (ED). Aim: To iterate a line-up and action cards for initial CPR management. To examine the experiences among participants regarding attitudes towards simulation and if they perceived any benefits for their patients after the participation. Method: In 2021 we performed 7 in-situ simulations (15-minute simulation, 15-minute hot debrief) in the ED with the CPR team including doctors and nurses from the ED and anaesthesiology department. A questionnaire was sent to the 48 participants the same day and after 3 and 18 months. Answers were given as yes/no or on a Likert scale 0-5 and are presented as median values with interquartile range (IQR) or frequencies. Results: A line-up and 9 action cards were created. The response rate of the three questionnaires were 52, 23, and 43%, respectively. In total, 100% would recommend the in-situ simulation to a co-worker. Participants perceived that real patients (5 [3-5]) as well as themselves, (5 [3.5-5]), had benefited from the simulation up to 18 months after. Conclusion: Thirty-minute in-situ simulations are feasible to implement in the ED and simulation observations were useful for development of standardised role descriptions for resuscitation in the ED. Participants self-report benefit for themselves as well as their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.