ArticleCells2023
Article in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulatory mechanisms of quorum sensing in microbial communities and their potential applications in ruminant livestock production.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Anti-Aspergillus flavus activity and probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the digestive tract of edible crickets.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies in the interaction between gut microbiota and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2026Review
- The Role of the Microbiome in the Resolution of Infection-Induced Inflammation.ACS infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Article
- Antibiofilm Activities of Halogenated Pyrimidines Against EnterohemorrhagicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- The control strategies forFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large-scale use of antimicrobials in agriculture and medicine contributes to antibiotic residues in raw foods, the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and drug pollution, which seriously threatens human health and imposes significant economic burdens on society, suggesting the need for novel therapeutic options that prevent or control zoonoses. In this study, four probiotics were selected to assess their capability to alleviate pathogen-induced damage. Results showed that a simulated gastrointestinal juice and bile tolerated
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.