Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37408219›Full record

ArticleCells2023

PPSW-SHAP: Towards Interpretable Cell Classification Using Tree-Based SHAP Image Decomposition and Restoration for High-Throughput Bright-Field Imaging.

Polat Goktas, Ricardo Simon Carbajo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Polat GoktasUCD School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-7183-6890
Ricardo Simon CarbajoUCD School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in high-throughput microscopy imaging have transformed cell analytics, enabling functionally relevant, rapid, and in-depth bioanalytics with Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a powerful driving force in cell therapy (CT) manufacturing. High-content microscopy screening often suffers from systematic noise, such as uneven illumination or vignetting artifacts, which can result in false-negative findings in AI models. Traditionally, AI models have been expected to learn to deal with these artifacts, but success in an inductive framework depends on sufficient training examples. To address this challenge, we propose a two-fold approach: (1) reducing noise through an image decomposition and restoration technique called the Periodic Plus Smooth Wavelet transform (PPSW) and (2) developing an interpretable machine learning (ML) platform using tree-based Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to enhance end-user understanding. By correcting artifacts during pre-processing, we lower the inductive learning load on the AI and improve end-user acceptance through a more interpretable heuristic approach to problem solving. Using a dataset of human Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) cultured under diverse density and media environment conditions, we demonstrate supervised clustering with mean SHAP values, derived from the 'DFT Modulus' applied to the decomposition of bright-field images, in the trained tree-based ML model. Our innovative ML framework offers end-to-end interpretability, leading to improved precision in cell characterization during CT manufacturing.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceWavelet AnalysisArtifactsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansMicroscopyartifactbright–field imagescell therapyimage decompositionimage restorationinterpretable machine learningShapley additive exPlanationsstem cells

Identifiers

PMID37408219
PMCPMC10216550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.