Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37408075›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2023

Compassionate use of a novel β-lactam enhancer-based investigational antibiotic cefepime/zidebactam (WCK 5222) for the treatment of extensively-drug-resistant NDM-expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in an intra-abdominal infection-induced sepsis patient: a case report.

Dilip Dubey, Manish Roy, Tajamul H Shah, Noor Bano, Vidushi Kulshrestha, Sandeep Mitra, Pushpender Sangwan, Madhulika Dubey, Ali Imran, Bhawna Jain and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04979806 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Comparative Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Cefepime-zidebactam vs. Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection or Acute Pyelonephritis in Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04979806 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Comparative Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Cefepime-zidebactam vs. Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection or Acute Pyelonephritis in Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorWockhardtRan2022 to 2024Enrolled530ConditionsComplicated Urinary Tract Infection, Acute PyelonephritisArmsCefepime-zidebactam (FEP-ZID), Meropenem
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Membrane-Focused Strategies AgainstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. In vitro activity and resistance mechanisms of novel antimicrobial agents against metallo-β-lactamase producers.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  12. Strategic re-engineering of antibiotics.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2025
    Article
  13. Difficult-to-TreatAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Study on resistance mechanisms and molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. New Agents Are Coming, and So Is the Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Dilip DubeyInstitute of Critical Care medicine, Medanta, Lucknow, India. drdilipdubey2d@gmail.com.
Manish RoyInstitute of Critical Care medicine, Medanta, Lucknow, India.
Tajamul H ShahDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, India.
Noor BanoInstitute of Critical Care medicine, Medanta, Lucknow, India.
Vidushi KulshresthaInstitute of Critical Care medicine, Medanta, Lucknow, India.
Sandeep MitraInstitute of Critical Care medicine, Medanta, Lucknow, India.
Pushpender SangwanInstitute of Critical Care medicine, Medanta, Lucknow, India.
Madhulika DubeyDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, ERA's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, India.
Ali ImranInstitute of Critical Care medicine, Medanta, Lucknow, India.
Bhawna JainDepartment of Microbiology, Medanta, Lucknow, India.
Aravind VelmuruganDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, India.
Yamuna Devi BakthavatchalamDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, India.
Balaji VeeraraghavanDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, India. vbalaji@cmcvellore.ac.in.
Medanta The Medicity · INChristian Medical College, Vellore · INChristian Medical College · INEra's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital · INSher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infections in critically-ill patients caused by extensively-drug-resistant (XDR)-Pseudomonas aeruginosa are challenging to manage due to paucity of effective treatment options. Cefepime/zidebactam, which is currently in global Phase 3 clinical development (Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT04979806, registered on July 28, 2021) is a novel mechanism of action based β-lactam/ β-lactam-enhancer combination with a promising activity against a broad-range of Gram-negative pathogens including XDR P. aeruginosa. We present a case report of an intra-abdominal infection-induced sepsis patient infected with XDR P. aeruginosa and successfully treated with cefepime/zidebactam under compassionate use. The 50 year old female patient with past-history of bariatric surgery and recent elective abdominoplasty and liposuction developed secondary pneumonia and failed a prolonged course of polymyxins. The organism repeatedly isolated from the patient was a New-Delhi metallo β-lactamase-producing XDR P. aeruginosa resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam, susceptible only to cefepime/zidebactam. As polymyxins failed to rescue the patient, cefepime/zidebactam was administered under compassionate grounds leading to discharge of patient in stable condition. The present case highlights the prevailing precarious scenario of antimicrobial resistance and the need for novel antibiotics to tackle infections caused by XDR phenotype pathogens.

Indexed as

Intraabdominal InfectionsPseudomonas InfectionsSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-LactamasesCefepimeCephalosporinsCompassionate Use TrialsCyclooctanesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMonobactamsPiperidinesPolymyxinsPseudomonas aeruginosaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-LactamasesCefepimeCephalosporinsCyclooctanesMonobactamsPiperidinesPolymyxinszidebactamCefepime/zidebactamExtensively-drug-resistantNew-Delhi metallo-β-lactamasePseudomonasβ-lactam-enhancer

Identifiers

PMID37408075
PMCPMC10324185
OpenAlexW4383198557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.