ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2023
Delivering the precision oncology paradigm: reduced R&D costs and greater return on investment through a companion diagnostic informed precision oncology medicines approach.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Animal-derived collagen and Islamic religious prescriptions: a systematic review.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Pooled it
- Implementation of precision medicine in treating non-communicable diseases: a systematic review.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A Chemical Approach to the Synthesis of an Antitumoral Pt-Based Drug Molecule Using a Protein-Ligand Interaction as a Carrier System.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Recognizing NIH's Role in Turning Discoveries into Cancer Treatments.LES nouvelles. Licensing Executives Society (U.S.A.) · 2026Article
- Article
- Disparities in access to systemic therapies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis from the International Liver Cancer Association.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence in drug discovery for neurological diseases.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
- Adverse Outcome Pathway and Machine Learning to Predict Drug Induced Seizure Liability.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2025Article
- Biomarker-Driven Approaches to Bone Metastases: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Applications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Genomics and multiomics in the age of precision medicine.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Lactylation in digestive system tumors: from mechanisms to therapeutic target.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Academia and society should join forces to make anti-cancer treatments more affordable.Molecular oncology · 2024Review
- Market resilience of orthopaedic hip/knee arthroplasty sales during COVID-19.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Cancer medicines: a private vice for public benefit?Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Article
- The Buzz Surrounding Precision Medicine: The Imperative of Incorporating It into Evidence-Based Medical Practice.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrecision oncology medicines represent a paradigm shift compared to non-precision oncology medicines in cancer therapy, in some situations delivering more clinical benefit, and potentially lowering healthcare costs. We determined whether employing a companion diagnostic (CDx) approach during oncology medicines development delivers effective therapies that are within the cost constraints of current health systems. R&D costs of developing a medicine are subject to debate, with average estimates ranging from $765 million (m) to $4.6 billion (b). Our aim was to determine whether precision oncology medicines are cheaper to bring from R&D to market; a secondary goal was to determine whether precision oncology medicines have a greater return on investment (ROI).
methodData on oncology medicines approved between 1997 and 2020 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were analysed from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings. Data were compiled from 10-K, 10-Q, and 20-F financial performance filings on medicines' development costs through their R&D lifetime. Clinical trial data were split into clinical trial phases 1-3 and probability of success (POS) of trials was calculated, along with preclinical costs. Cost-of-capital (CoC) approach was applied and, if appropriate, a tax rebate was subtracted from the total.
resultsData on 42 precision and 29 non-precision oncology medicines from 56 companies listed by the National Cancer Institute which had complete data available were analysed. Estimated mean cost to deliver a new oncology medicine was $4.4b (95% CI, $3.6-5.2b). Costs to bring a precision oncology medicine to market were $1.1b less ($3.5b; 95% CI, $2.7-4.5b) compared to non-precision oncology medicines ($4.6b; 95% CI, $3.5-6.1b). The key driver of costs was POS of clinical trials, accounting for a difference of $591.3 m. Additional data analysis illustrated that there was a 27% increase in return on investment (ROI) of precision oncology medicines over non-precision oncology medicines.
conclusionOur results provide an accurate estimate of the R&D spend required to bring an oncology medicine to market. Deployment of a CDx at the earliest stage substantially lowers the cost associated with oncology medicines development, potentially making them available to more patients, while staying within the cost constraints of cancer health systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.