Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37408018›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2023

Effects of goal-directed fluid management guided by a non-invasive device on the incidence of postoperative complications in neurosurgery: a pilot and feasibility randomized controlled trial.

Ondrej Hrdy, Milos Duba, Andrea Dolezelova, Ivana Roskova, Martin Hlavaty, Rudolf Traj, Vit Bönisch, Martin Smrcka, Roman Gal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04754295 (Effect of Goal-directed Fluid Management Guided by Non-invasive Device on Incidence of Postoperative Complications in Neurosurgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04754295 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Goal-directed Fluid Management Guided by Non-invasive Device on Incidence of Postoperative Complications in Neurosurgery: Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrno University HospitalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled34ConditionsSurgery--ComplicationsArmsGoal-Directed Therapy, STANDARD
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fluid-therapy for Brain Surgery: A Narrative Review.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ondrej HrdyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Milos DubaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. duba.milos@fnbrno.cz.
Andrea DolezelovaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ivana RoskovaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martin HlavatyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Rudolf TrajDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Vit BönischDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martin SmrckaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Roman GalDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
University Hospital Brno · CZMasaryk University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe positive effects of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) on patient-orientated outcomes have been demonstrated in various clinical scenarios; however, the effects of fluid management in neurosurgery remain unclear. Therefore, this study was aimed at assessing the safety and feasibility of GDHT using non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring in elective neurosurgery. The incidence of postoperative complications was compared between GDHT and control groups.

methodsWe conducted a single-center randomized pilot study with an enrollment target of 34 adult patients scheduled for elective neurosurgery. We randomly assigned the patients equally into control and GDHT groups. The control group received standard therapy during surgery and postoperatively, whereas the GDHT group received therapy guided by an algorithm based on non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring. In the GDHT group, we aimed to achieve and sustain an optimal cardiac index by using non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring and bolus administration of colloids and vasoactive drugs. The number of patients with adverse events, feasibility criteria, perioperative parameters, and incidence of postoperative complications was compared between groups.

resultsWe successfully achieved all feasibility criteria. The GDHT protocol was safe, because no patients in either group had unsatisfactory brain tissue relaxation after surgery or brain edema requiring therapy during surgery or 24 h after surgery. Major complications occurred in two (11.8%) patients in the GDHT group and six (35.3%) patients in the control group (p = 0.105).

conclusionsOur results suggested that a large randomized trial evaluating the effects of GDHT on the incidence of postoperative complications in elective neurosurgery should be safe and feasible. The rate of postoperative complications was comparable between groups.

trial registrationTrial registration: ClininalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT04754295, date of registration: February 15, 2021.

Indexed as

ComplicationsGoal-directed therapyHemodynamic monitoringNeuro-anesthesiaNeurosurgeryPostoperative outcome

Identifiers

PMID37408018
PMCPMC10321006
OpenAlexW4383227554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.