Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37408006›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2023

A framework for precision "dosing" of mental healthcare services: algorithm development and clinical pilot.

Jonathan Knights, Victoria Bangieva, Michela Passoni, Macayla L Donegan, Jacob Shen, Audrey Klein, Justin Baker, Holly DuBois

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Investigating the Role of Situational Disruptors in Engagement with Digital Mental Health Tools.CSCW : proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan KnightsMindstrong, Inc., 101 Jefferson Drive, Suite 228, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA. JonathanKnights.3783@gmail.com.
Victoria BangievaMindstrong, Inc., 101 Jefferson Drive, Suite 228, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Michela PassoniMindstrong, Inc., 101 Jefferson Drive, Suite 228, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Macayla L DoneganMindstrong, Inc., 101 Jefferson Drive, Suite 228, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Jacob ShenMindstrong, Inc., 101 Jefferson Drive, Suite 228, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Audrey KleinMindstrong, Inc., 101 Jefferson Drive, Suite 228, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Justin BakerMindstrong, Inc., 101 Jefferson Drive, Suite 228, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Holly DuBoisMindstrong, Inc., 101 Jefferson Drive, Suite 228, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Menlo School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne in five adults in the US experience mental illness and over half of these adults do not receive treatment. In addition to the access gap, few innovations have been reported for ensuring the right level of mental healthcare service is available at the right time for individual patients.

methodsHistorical observational clinical data was leveraged from a virtual healthcare system. We conceptualize mental healthcare services themselves as therapeutic interventions and develop a prototype computational framework to estimate their potential longitudinal impacts on depressive symptom severity, which is then used to assess new treatment schedules and delivered to clinicians via a dashboard. We operationally define this process as "session dosing": 497 patients who started treatment with severe symptoms of depression between November 2020 and October 2021 were used for modeling. Subsequently, 22 mental health providers participated in a 5-week clinical quality improvement (QI) pilot, where they utilized the prototype dashboard in treatment planning with 126 patients.

resultsThe developed framework was able to resolve patient symptom fluctuations from their treatment schedules: 77% of the modeling dataset fit criteria for using the individual fits for subsequent clinical planning where five anecdotal profile types were identified that presented different clinical opportunities. Based on initial quality thresholds for model fits, 88% of those individuals were identified as adequate for session optimization planning using the developed dashboard, while 12% supported more thorough treatment planning (e.g. different treatment modalities). In the clinical pilot, 90% of clinicians reported using the dashboard a few times or more per member. Although most clinicians (67.5%) either rarely or never used the dashboard to change session types, numerous other discussions were enabled, and opportunities for automating session recommendations were identified.

conclusionsIt is possible to model and identify the extent to which mental healthcare services can resolve depressive symptom severity fluctuations. Implementation of one such prototype framework in a real-world clinic represents an advancement in mental healthcare treatment planning; however, investigations to assess which clinical endpoints are impacted by this technology, and the best way to incorporate such frameworks into clinical workflows, are needed and are actively being pursued.

Indexed as

Digital healthcareIndirect response modelsLearning healthcare systemMeasurement-based careMental healthcarePrecision medicineSystems dynamicsTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID37408006
PMCPMC10320892
OpenAlexW4383263455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.