Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37408000›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

Long-term outcomes of the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage versus the titanium mesh cage for anterior reconstruction of thoracic and lumbar corpectomy: a retrospective study with at least 7 years of follow-up.

Bowen Hu, Liang Wang, Yueming Song, Xi Yang, Limin Liu, Chunguang Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Long-Term Outcomes of Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide 66 Strut in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bowen Hu *Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 GuoXue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Liang Wang *Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 GuoXue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Yueming SongDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 GuoXue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Xi YangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 GuoXue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. formosa88@163.com.
Limin LiuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 GuoXue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Chunguang ZhouDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 GuoXue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation General Program 2021M702337Post-Doctor Research Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University 2021HXBH048Science and Technology Project of the Health Planning Committee of Sichuan 2022NSFSC1528The 1-3-5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University ZYGD21001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 (n-HA/PA66) cage is a biomimetic cage with a lower elastic modulus than the titanium mesh cage (TMC). This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of the n-HA/PA66 cage and TMC in the anterior reconstruction of thoracic and lumbar fractures.

methodsWe retrospectively studied 113 patients with acute traumatic thoracic or lumbar burst fractures, comprising 60 patients treated with the TMC and 53 treated with the n-HA/PA66 cage for anterior reconstruction following single-level corpectomy. The radiographic data (cage subsidence, fusion status, segmental sagittal alignment) and clinical data (visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for function) were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, and at final follow-up after a minimum 7-year period.

resultsThe n-HA/PA66 and TMC groups had similar final fusion rates (96.2% vs. 95.0%). The cage subsidence at final follow-up was 2.3 ± 1.6 mm with subsidence of more than 3 mm occurring in 24.5% in the n-HA/PA66 group, which was significantly lower than the respective values of 3.9 ± 2.5 mm and 58.3% in the TMC group. The n-HA/PA66 group also had better correction of the bisegmental kyphotic angle than the TMC group (7.1° ± 7.5° vs 1.9° ± 8.6°, p < 0.01), with lower loss of correction (2.9° ± 2.5° vs 5.2° ± 4.1°, p < 0.01). The mean ODI steadily decreased after surgery in both groups. At final follow-up, the ODI and VAS were similar in the TMC and n-HA/PA66 groups.

conclusionsThe n-HA/PA66 cage is associated with excellent radiographic fusion, better maintenance of the height of the fused segment, and better correction of kyphosis than the TMC during 7 years of follow-up after one-level anterior corpectomy. With the added benefit of radiolucency, the n-HA/PA66 cage may be superior to the TMC in anterior reconstruction of thoracic or lumbar fractures.

Indexed as

Spinal FracturesSpinal FusionDurapatiteFollow-Up StudiesHumansLumbar VertebraeNylonsRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshTitaniumTreatment OutcomeDurapatiteNylonsTitaniumAnterior spinal fusionLong-term follow-upNano hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) cageTitanium mesh cageTraumatic thoracolumbar fracture

Identifiers

PMID37408000
PMCPMC10321011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.