Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37407998›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2023

Definitions of massive transfusion in adults with critical bleeding: a systematic review.

Victor S Lin, Emily Sun, Serine Yau, Chathuri Abeyakoon, Georgia Seamer, Simran Bhopal, Harriet Tucker, Carolyn Doree, Susan J Brunskill, Zoe K McQuilten and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Development and validation of an explainable machine learning-based model for predicting mortality risk in polytrauma patients].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  3. Association between time to transfusion and outcomes in patients with traumatic haemorrhagic shock: an analysis of a nationwide trauma registry in Japan.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Identifying Transfusion Triggers in Trauma Patients and Developing the Vellore Trauma Transfusion Score: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A comparison of clinical prediction scores for massive traumatic hemorrhage.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Victor S LinTransfusion Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Emily SunFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Serine YauFaculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Chathuri AbeyakoonDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia.
Georgia SeamerFaculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Simran BhopalFaculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Harriet TuckerBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Carolyn DoreeSystematic Review Initiative, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, UK.
Susan J BrunskillSystematic Review Initiative, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, UK.
Zoe K McQuiltenTransfusion Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Simon J StanworthSystematic Review Initiative, NHS Blood and Transplant, Oxford, UK.
Erica M WoodTransfusion Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Laura GreenBlizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. laura.green@qmul.ac.uk.
Monash University · AUMonash Health · AUNHS Blood and Transplant · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefinitions for massive transfusion (MT) vary widely between studies, contributing to challenges in interpretation of research findings and practice evaluation. In this first systematic review, we aimed to identify all MT definitions used in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to date to inform the development of consensus definitions for MT.

methodsWe systematically searched the following databases for RCTs from inception until 11 August 2022: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Transfusion Evidence Library. Ongoing trials were sought from CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. To be eligible for inclusion, studies had to fulfil all the following three criteria: (1) be an RCT; (2) include an adult patient population with major bleeding who had received, or were anticipated to receive, an MT in any clinical setting; and (3) specify a definition for MT as an inclusion criterion or outcome measure.

resultsOf the 8,458 distinct references identified, 30 trials were included for analysis (19 published, 11 ongoing). Trauma was the most common clinical setting in published trials, while for ongoing trials, it was obstetrics. A total of 15 different definitions of MT were identified across published and ongoing trials, varying greatly in cut-offs for volume transfused and time period. Almost all definitions specified the number of red blood cells (RBCs) within a set time period, with none including plasma, platelets or other haemostatic agents that are part of contemporary transfusion resuscitation. For completed trials, the most commonly used definition was transfusion of ≥ 10 RBC units in 24 h (9/19, all in trauma), while for ongoing trials it was 3-5 RBC units (n = 7), with the timing for transfusion being poorly defined, or in some trials not provided at all (n = 5).

conclusionsTransfusion of ≥ 10 RBC units within 24 h was the most commonly used definition in published RCTs, while lower RBC volumes are being used in ongoing RCTs. Any consensus definitions should reflect the need to incorporate different blood components/products for MT and agree on whether a 'one-size-fits-all' approach should be used across different clinical settings.

Indexed as

HemorrhageHemostaticsAdultBlood PlateletsBlood TransfusionErythrocyte TransfusionHumansHemostaticsBleedingDefinitionHaemorrhageMassive transfusionRandomised controlled trialsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37407998
PMCPMC10324127
OpenAlexW4383265398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.