Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37407963›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2023

High accuracy epidermal growth factor receptor mutation prediction via histopathological deep learning.

Dan Zhao, Yanli Zhao, Sen He, Zichen Liu, Kun Li, Lili Zhang, Xiaojun Zhang, Shuhao Wang, Nanying Che, Mulan Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Genomic Characterization of Lung Cancer in Never-Smokers Using Deep Learning.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dan ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, 101149, China.
Yanli ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, 101149, China.
Sen HeDigital Manufacturing Laboratory, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
Zichen LiuDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, 101149, China.
Kun LiDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, 101149, China.
Lili ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, 101149, China.
Xiaojun ZhangThorough Lab, Thorough Future, Beijing, 100036, China.
Shuhao WangThorough Lab, Thorough Future, Beijing, 100036, China. to@shuhao.wang.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5467-3548
Nanying CheDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing, 101149, China. cheny0448@163.com.
Mulan JinDepartment of Pathology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China. kinmokuran@163.com.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program PX2022065Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission Z191100006619079Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project Z181100001918027National Natural Science Foundation of China 82072381Tongzhou High-level Technique Talents Program YHLD2018006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer is critical for tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. EGFR detection requires tissue samples, which are difficult to obtain in some patients, costing them the opportunity for further treatment. To realize EGFR mutation prediction without molecular detection, we aimed to build a high-accuracy deep learning model with only haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides.

methodsWe collected 326 H&E-stained non-small cell lung cancer slides from Beijing Chest Hospital, China, and used 226 slides (88 with EGFR mutations) for model training. The remaining 100 images (50 with EGFR mutations) were used for testing. We trained a convolutional neural network based on ResNet-50 to classify EGFR mutation status on the slide level.

resultsThe sensitivity and specificity of the model were 76% and 74%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.82. When applying the double-threshold approach, 33% of the patients could be predicted by the deep learning model as EGFR positive or negative with a sensitivity and specificity of 100.0% and 87.5%. The remaining 67% of the patients got an uncertain result and will be recommenced to perform further examination. By incorporating adenocarcinoma subtype information, we achieved 100% sensitivity in predicting EGFR mutations in 37.3% of adenocarcinoma patients.

conclusionsOur study demonstrates the potential of a deep learning-based EGFR mutation prediction model for rapid and cost-effective pre-screening. It could serve as a high-accuracy complement to current molecular detection methods and provide treatment opportunities for non-small cell lung cancer patients from whom limited samples are available.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDeep LearningLung NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsHumansMutationErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID37407963
PMCPMC10320949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.