Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37407903›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2023

The Utility of Symptom Association Probability (SAP) in Predicting Outcome After Laparoscopic Fundoplication in Patients with Abnormal Esophageal Acid Exposure.

Donata Vaiciunaite, Sven E Eriksson, Inanc S Sarici, Ping Zheng, Ali H Zaidi, Blair Jobe, Shahin Ayazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Donata VaiciunaiteEsophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sven E ErikssonEsophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Inanc S SariciEsophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ping ZhengEsophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ali H ZaidiEsophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Blair JobeEsophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Shahin AyaziEsophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. shahin.ayazi@ahn.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8113-9164

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAbnormal DeMeester score on pH monitoring is a well-established predictor of favorable outcome after antireflux surgery (ARS). Esophageal pH monitoring also facilitates analysis of the temporal association between symptoms and reflux episodes. This association can be expressed with several symptom-reflux association indices with symptom association probability (SAP) being the most reliable. SAP is often used as an adjunct to DeMeester score during preoperative assessment of patients seeking ARS. However, data on the utility of SAP in predicting ARS outcome is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the utility of SAP as an adjunct to DeMeester score in predicting outcomes after fundoplication.

methodsRecords of patients who underwent primary fundoplication from 2015 to 2021 were reviewed. Patients with a preoperative DeMeester score >14.7 on Bravo pH monitoring were included. A SAP >95% was considered SAP-positive. Favorable outcome was defined as freedom from proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and patient satisfaction at 1 year postoperatively. Outcomes were compared based on the presence and number of SAP-positive symptoms, individual typical and atypical SAP-positive symptoms, and within demographic, clinical, and reflux severity subgroups.

resultsThe final study population consisted of 597 patients (71.4% female) with a median (IQR) age of 59.0 (49-67). At a mean (SD) follow-up of 10.5 (8) months, 82.0% patients achieved favorable outcome (satisfaction and freedom from PPI), freedom from PPI was 91.7%, and satisfaction was 87.4%. SAP was positive in 430 (72.0%) patients, of which 221 (37.0%) had one SAP-positive symptom, 164 (27.5%) had two SAP-positive symptoms, and 45 (7.5%) had all three SAP-positive symptoms. There was no association between having at least one SAP-positive symptom and favorable outcome (p=0.767). There was no difference in favorable outcome between patients with one, two, or all SAP-positive symptoms (0.785). Outcomes were comparable for SAP-positive typical (p=0.873) and atypical symptoms (p=1.000) and all individual symptoms (p>0.05). Outcomes were also comparable within all subgroups (p>0.05).

conclusionSymptom association probability with an abnormal DeMeester score did not enhance the prediction of antireflux surgery outcome. These findings suggest that SAP should not be used in surgical decision-making in patients with objective evidence of reflux.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal RefluxLaparoscopyFemaleFundoplicationHumansMaleProbabilityTreatment OutcomeAntireflux surgeryGERDNissen fundoplicationOutcomeSymptom association probability (SAP)

Identifiers

PMID37407903
PMCPMC10511574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.