Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37407899›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2023

Estimating Risk of Locoregional Failure and Overall Survival in Anal Cancer Following Chemoradiation: A Machine Learning Approach.

Kevin A Chen, Paolo Goffredo, David Hu, Chinmaya U Joisa, Jose G Guillem, Shawn M Gomez, Muneera R Kapadia

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin A ChenDivison of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 100 Manning Drive, 4038 Burnett Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Paolo GoffredoDivision of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MN, 55455, Minneapolis, USA.
David HuDepartment of Biostatistics, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7420, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7420, USA.
Chinmaya U JoisaJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 10202C Mary Ellen Jones Building, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Jose G GuillemDivison of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 100 Manning Drive, 4038 Burnett Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Shawn M GomezJoint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 10202C Mary Ellen Jones Building, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Muneera R KapadiaDivison of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 100 Manning Drive, 4038 Burnett Womack Building, CB #7050, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. muneera_kapadia@med.unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

UNC Integrated Translational Oncology Program (UNC-iTOP)T32CA244125 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WILLIAM Y. KIM, Jen Jen Yeh · 2019 to 2026
$3.9M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA244125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal treatment of anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is definitive chemoradiation. Patients with persistent or recurrent disease require abdominoperineal resection (APR). Current models for predicting need for APR and overall survival are limited by low accuracy or small datasets. This study sought to use machine learning (ML) to develop more accurate models for locoregional failure and overall survival for ASCC.

methodsThis study used the National Cancer Database from 2004-2018, divided into training, validation, and test sets. We included patients with stage I-III ASCC who underwent chemoradiation. Our primary outcomes were need for APR and 3-year overall survival. Random forest (RF), gradient boosting (XGB), and neural network (NN) ML-based models were developed and compared with logistic regression (LR). Accuracy was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).

resultsAPR was required in 5.3% (1,015/18,978) of patients. XGB performed best with AUROC of 0.813, compared with 0.691 for LR. Tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, and tumor grade showed the strongest influence on model predictions. Mortality was 23.6% (7,988/33,834). AUROC for XGB and LR were similar at 0.766 and 0.748, respectively. For this model, age, radiation dose, sex, and insurance status were the most influential variables.

conclusionsWe developed and internally validated machine learning-based models for predicting outcomes in ASCC and showed higher accuracy versus LR for locoregional failure, but not overall survival. After external validation, these models may assist clinicians with identifying patients with ASCC at high risk of treatment failure.

Indexed as

Anus NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellProctectomyChemoradiotherapyHumansMachine LearningTreatment FailureAbdominoperineal resectionAnal cancerArtificial intelligenceMachine learningOverall survival

Identifiers

PMID37407899
PMCPMC10528925
OpenAlexW4383216122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.