ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2023
Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review of Prospective Clinical Trials.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic challenges in bleeding renal tumors: A ruptured papillary renal cell carcinoma showing regression followed by progression.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- PABPC1 expression in papillary renal cell carcinoma and its significance for survival outcomes.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Impact of immune cells on renal cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis with clinical cohort validation.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Clinical and molecular prognostic nomograms for patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- A framework for target discovery in rare cancers.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Complete response to fifth-line anti-PD-1 rechallenge in fumarate hydratase-mutated papillary renal cell carcinoma.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Locoregional Therapies in Immunologically "Cold" Tumors: Opportunities and Clinical Trial Design Considerations.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2024Review
- Pattern of care and treatment outcomes of metastatic non-clear cell kidney cancer: a single centre experience from India.Ecancermedicalscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementPRCC is a unique histologic entity compared to other forms of renal cell carcinoma, harboring distinct molecular drivers. The WHO 2022 classification is further emphasizing the molecular biology by making molecular classifications of PRCC subclassifications and discontinuing the morphologic type 1 and type 2 classification system. We agree with this functional classification system and encourage all future clinical trials to only include patients with similar diagnosis instead of conducting basket trials (including all nccRCC together) which limits the scientific value of those conclusions. Based on recent disease-specific clinical trial (S1500, PAPMET), the current standard of care for patients with treatment naïve PRCC is cabozantinib. Prospective clinical trials clearly establish that immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has meaningful activity in PRCC. The data to date include only single-arm clinical trials of combination immune therapy. Despite the positive and encouraging results, we need validation through randomized studies because of the overestimation of effect size seen in single-arm trials. These randomized trials are currently underway and enrolling. We strongly encourage all physicians to support these studies and enroll patients with PRCC to these trials in order to continue improving the standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.