ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2023
Usefulness of UF-5000 automatic screening system in UTI diagnosis.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Urinary Cell-Free DNA detection platform for bacterial cystitis diagnosis via spot-based machine learning.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Urine Flow Cytometry (UF) in Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Detection and Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Enhancing clinical decision-making: Sysmex UF-5000 as a screening tool for bacterial urinary tract infection in children.PloS one · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Two Tests for the Rapid Detection of CTX-M Producers Directly in Urine Samples.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have evaluated the Sysmex UF-5000 cytometer use in microbiology for the screening of negative urines, looking for cut-off points to detect bacteria and leukocytes. The number of processed urines was 3569, the highest to date in these studies. The best general cut-off point has been 100 bact/μl, giving an area under the ROC curve of 0.868, a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 50%, 1.17% of false negatives, and saving 40% of cultures. The PPV and NPV have been 35.5 and 95.4 respectively. The leukocyte count has not been useful. Finally, we have evaluated urine screening usefulness, concluding that in laboratories such as ours (284 urines/working day) or smaller, it is not cost-effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.