ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023
Efficient Collaboration Between Radiologists Using the PACS-Integrated Refer Function to Reduce Communication Times.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Five Things That Radiologists Can Do to Improve Their Technology Quotient.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of a picture archiving and communication systems (PACS)-integrated refer function for improving collaboration between radiologists and radiographers during daily reading sessions. Retrospective analysis was conducted on refers sent by radiologists using a PACS-integrated refer system from March 2020 to December 2021. Refers were categorized according to receiver: radiologists in the same division (intra-division), radiologists in a different division (inter-division), and radiographers. The proportions of answered refers, content of refers, and timing of refer posts were evaluated. Additionally, time intervals in minutes from initial refer post to refer response were assessed to assess the efficiency of the refer system and compared according to receivers using the Mann-Whitney U test. Among a total of 691 refers posted by radiologists, 579 (83.8%) were answered directly using the refer function in PACS. Of the answered refers, 346 refers (59.8%) were made between radiologists, and 173 (50%) were intra-division refers. About the content of refers, about 82.6% of radiologists' refers were about imaging interpretation consultation, and about 98.9% of refers from radiologists to radiographers were for image quality control. The median time interval until refer response was 9 min, and this response time did not differ between intra-division and inter-division refers (p = 0.998). Of the refers that got responses, 74.3% (257/346) were sent among radiologists before official reports were made, and the median time until refer response was 9-10 min. The proportion of refers answered by radiographers was 85.7% (233/272). The median time interval until refer response by radiographers was 87 min for all refers, and 63% were made within 6 h. Therefore, the PACS-integrated refer function can facilitate communication between radiologists for image interpretation and quality control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.