ReviewOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2023
[Conservative treatment of distal radial fractures].
Review in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcome analysis of conservative treatment of a distal radius fracture with OPTIVOhand orthosis versus plaster cast: a randomized controlled trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Trial
- Development and validation of a nomogram model for predicting the risk of failed manual reduction in distal radius fractures.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Dorsoradial vs. circular cast for distal radius fractures: a retrospective comparative cohort study.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025Article
- Risk stratification for failure of conservative treatment in a cohort of 270 diametaphyseal radius fractures.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- An exploration into the principles and theoretical progress of fracture treatment based on the mechanism of fracture healing.Biomaterials translational · 2025Review
- Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Distal Radius Fractures in Osteoporosis: A Comparative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDistal fracture of the radius is common in all age groups. Under careful consideration of individual indications and contraindications, conservative treatment with reduction and immobilization can have significant advantages over the frequently applied surgical approach, particularly in older patients. THERAPEUTIC GOAL: Immobilization after closed reduction enables satisfactory wrist function to be achieved according to individual patient expectations. INDICATIONS: A. Patients with a. significant comorbidities, b. high surgical risk from an anesthesiology perspective (ASA > 3), c. low functional requirements, d. low cosmetic expectations regarding residual visible deformity. B. Young patients with an extension fracture and additional a. < 10° dorsal tilt in the case of extraarticular fractures after closed reduction, b. < 5 mm radial shortening after closed reduction, c. < 2 mm intraarticular displacement after closed reduction. CONTRAINDICATIONS: A. Patient age < 65 years with an extension fracture and additional a. > 10° dorsal tilt in the case of extraarticular fractures after closed reduction, b. > 5 mm radial shortening after closed reduction, c. > 2 mm intraarticular displacement after closed reduction. B. Flexion fracture for which ligamentotaxis for closed reduction is not possible. C. Open distal radial fracture. D. Fracture dislocations. E. Impairments of peripheral circulation, motor or sensory function of the hand after reduction. TECHNIQUE: After puncturing the fracture hematoma and infiltrating the fracture gap with local anesthetic, the forearm is suspended using Chinese finger traps on the thumb and middle finger. Constant traction in the longitudinal axis of the forearm is ensured by a weight applied via a wide cushioned cuff to the distal upper arm. Reduction then is enabled with the additional reductive effect of ligamentotaxis. After minimal cushioning of the forearm with cotton wool and crepe bandage, a dorsal gypsum longuette is applied. After the plaster bandage has hardened, peripheral circulation, motor function, and sensitivity are checked. The reduction is controlled by X‑ray and documented. POSTPROCEDURAL MANAGEMENT: A. General procedures to reduce swelling; sufficient analgesics should be prescribed. B. The circular plaster cast is applied once swelling has subsided sufficiently, generally after 2-3 days. C. The duration of cast wearing should be planned at 5 weeks.
resultsA total of 73 patients (55 women and 18 men) aged 65-88 years were followed up for 12 months to investigate functional outcomes after surgical and conservative therapy. While surgical patients had better functional scores up to 12 weeks after treatment begin, there was no longer a significant difference in the 6‑ and 12-month follow-up results. The measured grip strength was consistently better in the surgically treated group. Clinically visible deformities were present in 78% of the conservatively treated patients; however, the patients were satisfied with the functional or cosmetic results. No deformities were seen in the surgically treated patients. All fractures were completely healed after 6 months. The rate of complications was significantly higher in the surgery group, with 13 complications compared to 5 in the conservative treatment group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37407790What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.