ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2023
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival benefit of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT staging for prognostic assessment in gastric and colorectal cancer compared with CE-CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT: a single-center retrospective study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Gastrointestinal cancer with indeterminateOncology letters · 2026Article
- Benign and malignant uptake in the postoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal tumors: a comparative study ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluating the diagnostic value ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Head-to-head comparison of [Translational cancer research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to compare the diagnostic efficacy of
methodsGastrointestinal cancer patients who planned to
resultsCompared with non-recurrent patients, the recurrent patients exhibited a significantly higher anastomotic SUV
conclusionsBoth tracers displayed high NPVs in identifying anastomotic recurrence with a higher sensitivity to
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.