Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37407731›Full record

Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2023

Initial therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban compared to prophylactic therapy with heparins in moderate to severe COVID-19: results of the COVID-PREVENT randomized controlled trial.

Ursula Rauch-Kröhnert, Marianna Puccini, Marius Placzek, Jan Beyer-Westendorf, Kai Jakobs, Julian Friebel, Selina Hein, Mirko Seidel, Burkert Pieske, Steffen Massberg and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Immunity and Coagulation in COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Ursula Rauch-KröhnertDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany. ursula.rauch@dhzc-charite.de.
Marianna PucciniDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Marius PlaczekDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Jan Beyer-WestendorfDepartment of Medicine I, Universitätsklinikum "Carl Gustav Carus" Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Kai JakobsDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Julian FriebelDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Selina HeinKatholisches Klinikum Koblenz-Montabaur, Koblenz, Germany.
Mirko SeidelBG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Burkert PieskeDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Steffen MassbergDepartment of Medicine I, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Martin WitzenrathBerlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas ZeiherDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
Tim FriedeDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Stefan D AnkerDZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ulf LandmesserDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany. ulf.landmessser@dhzc-charite.de.
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research · DEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEKatholisches Klinikum Koblenz · DEUnfallkrankenhaus Berlin · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 is associated with a prothrombotic state. Current guidelines recommend prophylactic anticoagulation upon hospitalization.

methodsCOVID-PREVENT, an open-label, multicenter, randomized, clinical trial enrolled patients (≥ 18 years) with moderate to severe COVID-19 and age-adjusted D-dimers > 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN). The participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either therapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily or thromboprophylaxis with a heparin (SOC) for at least 7 days followed by prophylactic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily for 28 days or no thromboprophylaxis. The primary efficacy outcome was the D-dimer level and the co-primary efficacy outcome the 7-category ordinal COVID-19 scale by WHO at 7 days post randomization. The secondary outcome was time to the composite event of either venous or arterial thromboembolism, new myocardial infarction, non-hemorrhagic stroke, all-cause death or progression to intubation and invasive ventilation up to 35 days post randomization.

resultsThe primary efficacy outcome D-dimer at 7 days was not different between patients assigned to therapeutic (n = 55) or prophylactic anticoagulation (n = 56) (1.21 mg/L [0.79, 1.86] vs 1.27 mg/L [0.79, 2.04], p = 0.78). In the whole study population D-dimer was significantly lower at 7 days compared to baseline (1.05 mg/L [0.75, 1.48] vs 1.57 mg/L [1.13, 2.19], p < 0.0001). Therapy with rivaroxaban compared to SOC was not associated an improvement on the WHO 7-category ordinal scale at 7 days (p = 0.085). Rivaroxaban improved the clinical outcome measured by the score in patients with a higher baseline D-dimer  > 2.0 ULN (exploratory analysis; 0.632 [0.516, 0.748], p = 0.026). The secondary endpoint occurred in 6 patients (10.9%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 12 (21.4%) in the SOC group (time-to-first occurrence of the components of the secondary outcome: HR 0.5; 95% CI 0.15-1.67; p = 0.264). There was no difference in fatal or non-fatal major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding between the groups.

conclusionsTherapeutic anticoagulation with rivaroxaban compared to prophylactic anticoagulation with a heparin did not improve surrogates of clinical outcome in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. Whether initial rivaroxaban at therapeutic doses might be superior to thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19 and a high risk as defined by D-dimer  > 2 ULN needs confirmation in further studies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Venous ThromboembolismAnticoagulantsHeparinHumansRivaroxabanSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsHeparinRivaroxabanAnticoagulationCOVID-19RivaroxabanThromboprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID37407731
PMCPMC10584737
OpenAlexW4383218654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.