Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37407695›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2024

Socket outcomes following enucleation for uveal melanoma: post enucleation socket syndrome can be challenging.

Clare Quigley, Hanan Elshelmani, Gabrijela Fajin, Aisling McGlacken- Byrne, Clare McCloskey, Valerie O'Neill, Noel Horgan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clare QuigleyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Adelaide Road, Dublin 2, D02 XK51, Ireland. quigleyclare@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6914-7447
Hanan ElshelmaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Adelaide Road, Dublin 2, D02 XK51, Ireland.
Gabrijela FajinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Adelaide Road, Dublin 2, D02 XK51, Ireland.
Aisling McGlacken- ByrneDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Adelaide Road, Dublin 2, D02 XK51, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7167-522X
Clare McCloskeyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Adelaide Road, Dublin 2, D02 XK51, Ireland.
Valerie O'NeillDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Adelaide Road, Dublin 2, D02 XK51, Ireland.
Noel HorganDepartment of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, Adelaide Road, Dublin 2, D02 XK51, Ireland.
Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate socket outcomes of enucleation for uveal melanoma.

methodsThis study was a retrospective chart review conducted in December 2022 of all patients who underwent enucleation surgery for uveal melanoma between 2010 and 2015 in the Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, to evaluate socket outcomes including completion of revision surgery, type of surgery, and completion of multiple revision surgeries, and potential associations.

resultsBetween June 2010 and December 2015, 72 patients underwent enucleation for uveal melanoma in the ocular oncology service, including 25 females and 47 males, mean age 65, range 11-91 years old. There were 68 primary enucleations and 4 secondary enucleations. Complete follow-up data was available for mean 4 years, range 1-11 years. Fourteen patients underwent further surgery, including one exenteration for local recurrence. Oculoplastic surgery (n = 6, 8%), implant exposure repair (n = 3, 6%), and orbit volume expanding surgery (n = 4, 6%) were also performed. Eight patients (11%) underwent one further surgery and five patients (7%) underwent a series of procedures. There was a significant association with younger age at enucleation (age <65) with undergoing further surgery (p = 0.03, Fisher's Exact Test (FET)), and also an association of younger age with undergoing multiple further surgeries (p = 0.02, FET). There was no association found with other predictor variables, including primary versus secondary enucleation status. Most patients (75%) with PESS underwent more than one surgery.

conclusionPost enucleation surgery 82% of patients did not undergo further surgery, but younger patients were more likely to undergo anophthalmic socket revision or oculoplastic surgery. Management of post enucleation socket syndrome was challenging and usually involved a series of procedures.

Indexed as

Orbital DiseasesOrbital ImplantsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildEye EnucleationFemaleHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesUveal Melanoma

Identifiers

PMID37407695
PMCPMC10764347
OpenAlexW4383218080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.