Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37407692›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Modeling interfacial tension of surfactant-hydrocarbon systems using robust tree-based machine learning algorithms.

Ali Rashidi-Khaniabadi, Elham Rashidi-Khaniabadi, Behnam Amiri-Ramsheh, Mohammad-Reza Mohammadi, Abdolhossein Hemmati-Sarapardeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ali Rashidi-KhaniabadiDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, EOR Research Center, Omidiyeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Omidiyeh, Iran.
Elham Rashidi-KhaniabadiDepartment of Mathematics, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran.
Behnam Amiri-RamshehDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Mohammad-Reza MohammadiDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Abdolhossein Hemmati-SarapardehDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran. hemmati@uk.ac.ir.
Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman · IRIslamic Azad University, Omidieh Branch · IRYazd University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interfacial tension (IFT) between surfactants and hydrocarbon is one of the important parameters in petroleum engineering to have a successful enhanced oil recovery (EOR) operation. Measuring IFT in the laboratory is time-consuming and costly. Since, the accurate estimation of IFT is of paramount significance, modeling with advanced intelligent techniques has been used as a proper alternative in recent years. In this study, the IFT values between surfactants and hydrocarbon were predicted using tree-based machine learning algorithms. Decision tree (DT), extra trees (ET), and gradient boosted regression trees (GBRT) were used to predict this parameter. For this purpose, 390 experimental data collected from previous studies were used to implement intelligent models. Temperature, normal alkane molecular weight, surfactant concentration, hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB), and phase inversion temperature (PIT) were selected as inputs of models and independent variables. Also, the IFT between the surfactant solution and normal alkanes was selected as the output of the models and the dependent variable. Moreover, the implemented models were evaluated using statistical analyses and applied graphical methods. The results showed that DT, ET, and GBRT could predict the data with average absolute relative error values of 4.12%, 3.52%, and 2.71%, respectively. The R-squared of all implementation models is higher than 0.98, and for the best model, GBRT, it is 0.9939. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis using the Pearson approach was utilized to detect correlation coefficients of the input parameters. Based on this technique, the results of sensitivity analysis demonstrated that PIT, surfactant concentration, and HLB had the greatest effect on IFT, respectively. Finally, GBRT was statistically credited by the Leverage approach.

Identifiers

PMID37407692
PMCPMC10322925
OpenAlexW4383264817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.