ArticleScientific reports2023
Persistent homological cell tracking technology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Persistent homology-based segmentation tool for membrane images.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we develop a cell tracking method based on persistent homological figure detection technology. We apply our tracking method to 9 different time-series cell images and extract several kinds of cell movements. Being able to analyze various images with a single method allows researchers to systematically understand and compare different tracking data. Persistent homological cell tracking technology's 9 parameters all have clear meanings. Thus, researchers can decide the parameters not by black box trial-and-error but by the purpose of their analysis. We use model data with ground truth to see our method's performance. We compare persistent homological figure detection and cell tracking technology with Image-Pro, sure-foreground in watershed method, and cell detection methods in previous studies. We see that there are some cases where Image-Pro's tracking stops and requires manual plots, while our method does not require manual plots. We show that our technology includes sure-foreground and has more information, and can be applied to different types of data that previously needed different methods. We also show that our technology is powerful as a detection technology by applying the technology to 5 different types of cell images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.