Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37407230›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open gastroenterology2023

Variation in the rate of detection of minute and small early gastric cancers at diagnostic endoscopy may reflect the performance of individual endoscopists.

Daisuke Murakami, Masayuki Yamato, Yuji Amano, Takayoshi Nishino, Makoto Arai

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI-Assisted Detection May Help Identify Visible but Missed Gastric Cancers During Routine Upper Endoscopy.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daisuke MurakamiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Centre, Yachiyo, Chiba, Japan daisuke.murakami@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6012-844X
Masayuki YamatoInstitute of Advanced Biomedical Engineering and Science, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuji AmanoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, New Tokyo Hospital, Mtsudo, Chiba, Japan.
Takayoshi NishinoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Centre, Yachiyo, Chiba, Japan.
Makoto AraiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Centre, Yachiyo, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe documented variation in gastric cancer (GC) detection among endoscopists has often been dismissed as a coincidental artefact of the low incidence of gastric neoplasms; it is not considered associated with differences in physicians' performance of the esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedure. This study is to confirm whether significant variations among endoscopists in early GC detection suggest the individual performance of the upper endoscopy.

designA retrospective observational study at a single centre in Japan assessed the results of 218 early GCs detected during 25 688 routine esophagogastroduodenoscopies by 12 endoscopists. The main outcome was the rate of early GC detection for each endoscopist under the same circumstances. Other measures included the major diameters and locations of the lesions,

resultsThe early GC detection rates exhibited wide variation among endoscopists (0.09%-2.87%) despite performing routine esophagogastroduodenoscopies in a population with a similar background. Endoscopists were assigned to a low-detection group (n=6; detection rate: 0.47% (range: 0.09%-0.55%)) and a high-detection group (n=5; detection rate: 0.83% (range: 0.63%-1.12%)), with the single highest detector analysed separately due to his distinct detection rate (2.87%). Endoscopists in the high-detection group had better detection rates for minute (major diameter ≤5 mm) and small (major diameter 6-10 mm) GCs than the low-detection group (0.19%/0.23% vs 0.085%/0.098%). These differences were significant (p<0.01), although there were no significant differences in detection of larger tumours (major diameter ≥11 mm; 0.40% vs 0.28%; p=0.13). The tumour location and

conclusionSignificant variation in the detection of hard-to-find, smaller GCs may reflect individual performance of the examination.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriStomach NeoplasmsHumansRetrospective Studiesdiagnostic and therapeutic endoscopyendoscopygastric cancer

Identifiers

PMID37407230
PMCPMC10335432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.