ReviewClinical medicine & research2023
Invasive versus Conservative Management in Coronary Artery Disease.
Review in Clinical medicine & research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rosuvastatin calcium administration and its impact on myocardial microcirculation and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- The detection of cardiovascular biomarkers in dermal interstitial fluid - a step to real-time monitoring.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Incidence and Predictors of Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting at a Reference Hospital in Brazil: Influence of Sex, Nutritional Risk, and Body Mass Index.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Conservative Management of Coronary Perforation: Lessons from the Oleander Bloom.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of colchicine in patients with coronary artery disease: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- Impact of early coronary angiography on short-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective study.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.