Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37407165›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2023

Iodine Intake From Diet and Supplements and Urinary Iodine Concentration in a Cohort of Pregnant Women in the United States.

Adrianne K Griebel-Thompson, Scott Sands, Lynn Chollet-Hinton, Danielle Christifano, Debra K Sullivan, Holly Hull, Juliana Teruel Camargo, Susan E Carlson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Iodine Prescribing Update.Integrative medicine (Encinitas, Calif.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adrianne K Griebel-ThompsonBaby Health Behavior Lab, Division of Health Services and Health Outcomes Research ,Children's Mercy Research Institute, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA. Electronic address: akgriebelthompso@cmh.edu.
Scott SandsMaternal and Infant Nutrition and Development Lab, Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66106, USA.
Lynn Chollet-HintonDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66106, USA.
Danielle ChristifanoMaternal and Infant Nutrition and Development Lab, Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66106, USA.
Debra K SullivanMaternal and Infant Nutrition and Development Lab, Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66106, USA.
Holly HullMaternal and Infant Nutrition and Development Lab, Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66106, USA.
Juliana Teruel CamargoMinority Health and Health Disparities Population Lab, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892.
Susan E CarlsonMaternal and Infant Nutrition and Development Lab, Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66106, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe DRI Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) in pregnancy for Iodine (I), an essential nutrient for fetal neurodevelopment, is 160 μg/d. Supplementation with 150 μg/d I/day is recommended during pregnancy, however, neither dietary intake or the combination of diet and supplement intake has been reported in US pregnant women.

objectiveDetermine iodine intake from diet and supplements and iodine status in pregnancy by urinary iodine concentration in a large cohort of pregnant women.

designPregnant women (n=750) completed the Diet History Questionnaire 2.0 from the National Institute of Cancer or multiple 24-hour recalls at baseline and identified their prenatal supplement(s). Dietary iodine intake was estimated using the USDA, FDA and ODS-NIH Database for the Iodine Content of Common Foods at enrollment, supplemental iodine intake throughout the study using content databases, and urinary iodine concentration (UIC) by the modified Sandell-Kolthoff reaction in samples collected between 14-20 weeks gestation (n=966).

resultsThe median intake of iodine from diet was 108.8 μg/d, and 63% (473/750) were below the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR). Furthermore, 65% (529/818) took a supplement containing iodine, however, only 32% (259/818) took ≥150 μg/d. Median intake increased to 188.5 μg/d with the inclusion of I from supplements, however , 41% (380/925) remained below the EAR even after supplementation suggesting inadequate intake in nearly half of the cohort. A similar 48% (467/966) had UIC ≤150 μg/L.

conclusionsAssessment of iodine status by UIC and intake of iodine from diet and supplements support a high prevalence of iodine insufficiency during pregnancy in this large cohort of US women.

Indexed as

IodineDietDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansNutritional StatusPregnancyPregnant PeopleUnited StatesIodinedietary iodine intakeIodinepregnancysupplemental iodineurinary iodine concentration

Identifiers

PMID37407165
PMCPMC10493429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.