Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37407066›Full record

ArticleBMJ leader2024

Method to share learning in real time at scientific meetings: lessons from the IHI-BMJ International Conference on Quality and Safety.

Johanna Figueroa, Marianne E McPherson, Göran Henriks, James Mountford, Pierre Barker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ leader, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johanna FigueroaInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Marianne E McPhersonInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Göran HenriksQulturum, Jonkoping, Sweden.
James MountfordGalileo Global Foundation, Paris, Paris, France.
Pierre BarkerInstitute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA pbarker@ihi.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0963-0899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCapturing and disseminating key learnings on emerging themes for conference participants is challenging, yet also presents a significant opportunity to distill, share and discuss learning in real time with conference organisers and attendees. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) and

aimTo test a learning system that harvested and synthesised the key lessons shared by conference participants at the 2022 IHI-BMJ Gothenburg Forum, and to disseminate this content.

methodsTwelve invited Forum attendees collected and shared their 'breakthrough learnings' via electronic survey. Three IHI team members synthesised the participants' responses into themes that were shared and refined in real time at an in-person Forum session including 35 additional participants.

resultsParticipants shared four learning themes: collaboration and co-production, trust, meaningful communication about data, and broadening the scope of the Science of Improvement field to multi-disciplinary and multi-system approaches.

conclusionsCollection of key learning on emerging topics of interest to the health system improvement community is feasible and yielded information both for dissemination and real-time learning. While not representing the full scope of the conference learnings, the content resonated with an additional group of reviewers at the conclusion of the conference and has guided planning for the next annual meeting. This approach may be helpful in capturing key themes for discussion and planning by similar improvement communities.

Indexed as

CommunicationLearningHealth FacilitiesHumansSurveys and Questionnairescommunicationcontinuous improvementhealth policyhealth systemlearning loop

Identifiers

PMID37407066
PMCPMC12038122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.