Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37407050›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Unveiling the spatial divide in open defecation practices across India: an application of spatial regression and Fairlie decomposition model.

Avijit Roy, Margubur Rahaman, Mihir Adhikary, Nanigopal Kapasia, Pradip Chouhan, Kailash Chandra Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Avijit RoyDepartment of Geography, Malda College, Malda, West Bengal, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2707-8639
Margubur RahamanDepartment of Migration & Urban Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India margubur48@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2403-9033
Mihir AdhikaryDepartment of Public Health & Mortality Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3569-5151
Nanigopal KapasiaDepartment of Geography, Malda College, Malda, West Bengal, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6386-8155
Pradip ChouhanDepartment of Geogrpahy, University of Gour Banga, Malda, West Bengal, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5500-2842
Kailash Chandra DasDepartment of Migration & Urban Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study contextualises the spatial heterogeneity and associated drivers of open defecation (OD) in India.

designThe present study involved a secondary cross-sectional survey data from the fifth round of the National Family Health Survey conducted during 2019-2021 in India. We mapped the spatial heterogeneity of OD practices using LISA clustering techniques and assessed the critical drivers of OD using multivariate regression models. Fairlie decomposition model was used to identify the factors responsible for developing OD hot spots and cold spots. SETTING AND

participantsThe study was conducted in India and included 636 699 sampled households within 36 states and union territories covering 707 districts of India. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measure was the prevalence of OD.

resultsThe prevalence of OD was almost 20%, with hot spots primarily located in the north-central belts of the country. The rural-urban (26% vs 6%), illiterate-higher educated (32% vs 4%) and poor-rich (52% vs 2%) gaps in OD were very high. The odds of OD were 2.7 and 1.9 times higher in rural areas and households without water supply service on premises compared with their counterparts. The spatial error model identified households with an illiterate head (coefficient=0.50, p=0.001) as the leading spatially linked predictor of OD, followed by the poorest (coefficient=0.31, p=0.001) and the Hindu (coefficient=0.10, p=0.001). The high-high and low-low cluster inequality in OD was 38%, with household wealth quintile (67%) found to be the most significant contributing factor, followed by religion (22.8%) and level of education (6%).

conclusionThe practice of OD is concentrated in the north-central belt of India and is particularly among the poor, illiterate and socially backward groups. Policy measures should be taken to improve sanitation practices, particularly in high-focus districts and among vulnerable groups, by adopting multispectral and multisectoral approaches.

Indexed as

DefecationSpatial RegressionCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIndiaSocioeconomic FactorsGeographical mappingPublic healthRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID37407050
PMCPMC10335484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.