ArticleBMJ open2023
Predictors of specialist somatic healthcare utilization among older people with intellectual disability and their age-peers in the general population: a national register study.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- IDcare - a longitudinal register study of pre-pandemic and pandemic health care utilization and diagnostic profiles among people with intellectual disabilities in southern Sweden.European journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Specialist psychiatric health care utilization among older people with intellectual disability - predictors and comparisons with the general population: a national register study.BMC psychiatry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare somatic healthcare usage among older people with intellectual disabilities (ID) to that of their age-peers in the general population, taking into account health and demographic factors, and to identify predictors for somatic healthcare usage among older people with ID.
participantsEqually sized cohorts, one with people with ID and one referent cohort, one-to-one-matched by sex and year of birth, were created. Each cohort comprised 7936 people aged 55+ years at the end of 2012.
designRetrospective register-based study.
settingAll specialist inpatient and outpatient healthcare clinics in Sweden. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data regarding planned/unplanned and inpatient/outpatient specialist healthcare were collected from the Swedish National Patient Register for 2002-2012. Diagnoses, previous healthcare usage, sex, age and cohort affiliation was used to investigate potential impact on healthcare usage.
resultsCompared with the referent cohort, the ID cohort were more likely to have unplanned inpatient and outpatient care but less likely to have planned outpatient care. Within the ID cohort, sex, age and previous use of healthcare predicted healthcare usage.
conclusionsOlder people with ID seem to have lower risks of planned outpatient care compared with the general population that could not be explained by diagnoses. Potential explanations are that people with ID suffer from communication difficulties and experience the healthcare environment as unfriendly. Moreover, healthcare staff lack knowledge about the particular needs of people with ID. Altogether, this may lead to people with ID being exposed to discrimination. Although these problems are known, few interventions have been evaluated, especially related to planned outpatient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.