Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37407036›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Social support and psychosocial well-being among older adults in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.

Ji Lu, Juyang Xiong, Shangfeng Tang, Ghose Bishwajit, Shuyan Guo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ji LuSchool of medicine and health management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong university of science and technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2506-7223
Juyang XiongSchool of medicine and health management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong university of science and technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0073-1826
Shangfeng TangSchool of medicine and health management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong university of science and technology, Wuhan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8178-2486
Ghose BishwajitFaculty of health sciences, University of ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4461-3821
Shuyan GuoNational Institute of Hospital Administration, National Health Commission, Beijing, China guoshuyan@niha.org.cn.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNNational Institute of Hospital Administration · CNUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the study was to identify the association between social support and psychosocial well-being among men and women aged over 65 years in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsCross-sectional data on 36 621 men (n=15 719) and women (n=20,902) aged 65 years or higher were obtained from the ninth round of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. The outcomes were measured by psychosocial well-being reflected with self-reported depression, nervousness, loneliness and sleep disturbances. Social support was measured in terms of receiving help from own children, relatives and neighbours/friends/colleagues since the pandemic outbreak.

resultAbout one-third of the participants reported depression (31.03%), nervousness (32.85%), loneliness (32.23%) and sleep trouble (33.01%). The results of multivariable regression analysis revealed that social support was a protective factor to psychological well-being. For instance, receiving help from own children (RD=-0.13, 95% CI=-0.14 to -0.12), relatives (RD=-0.08, 95% CI=-0.11 to -0.06), neighbours/friends/colleagues (RD=-0.11, 95% CI=-0.13 to -0.09) and receiving home care (RD=-0.20, 95% CI=-0.22 to -0.18) showed significantly lower risk difference for depression. Similar findings were noted for loneliness, nervousness, and sleep trouble as well, with the risk difference being slightly different for men and women in the gender-stratified analysis. For instance, the risk difference in depression for receiving help from own children was -0.10 (95% CI=-0.12 to -0.08) among men compared with -0.12 (95% CI=-0.14 to -0.11) among women. The risk differences in the outcome measures were calculated using generalised linear model for binomial family.

conclusionFindings of the present study highlight a protective role of social support on psychological well-being among both men and women. Developing strategies to promote social support, especially among older adults, may mitigate the rising burden of psychological illness during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedChildCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionEuropeFemaleHumansLonelinessMalePandemicsSocial SupportCOVID-19MENTAL HEALTHSOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID37407036
PMCPMC10335576
OpenAlexW4383198204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.