Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37406827›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2023

Declarations of Independence: How Embedded Multicollinearity Errors Affect Dosimetric and Other Complex Analyses in Radiation Oncology.

Susannah G Ellsworth, Peter S N van Rossum, Radhe Mohan, Steven H Lin, Clemens Grassberger, Brian Hobbs

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The Challenges Discovering the Mechanisms Underlying Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia From Clinical Data.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Susannah G EllsworthDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Hillman Cancer Center, PIttsburgh, PA. Electronic address: ellsworths3@upmc.edu.
Peter S N van RossumDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Radhe MohanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Steven H LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Clemens GrassbergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Brian HobbsDepartment of Population Health, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, TX.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Washington · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

Project 3: Enhanced Sensitivity of Tumors to Proton Beam Therapy: Mechanisms and Biomarkers.P01CA261669 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HONG, THEODORE S · 2021 to 2025
$14.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA261669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The statistical technique of multiple regression, commonly referred to as "multivariable regression," is often used in clinical research to quantify the relationships between multiple predictor variables and a single outcome variable of interest. The foundational theory underpinning multivariable regression assumes that all predictor variables are independent of one another. In other words, the effect of each independent variable is measured by its contribution to the regression equation while all other variables remain unchanged. In the presence of correlations between two or more variables, however, it is impossible to change one variable without a consequent change in the variable(s) it is linked to. This condition, known as "multicollinearity," can introduce errors into multivariable regression models by affecting estimates of the regression coefficients that quantify the relationship between individual predictor variables and the outcome variable. Errors that arise due to violations of the multicollinearity assumption are of special interest to radiation oncology researchers. Because of high levels of correlation among variables derived from points along individual organ dose-volume histogram (DVH) curves, as well as strong intercorrelations among dose-volume parameters in neighboring organs, dosimetric analyses are particularly subject to multicollinearity errors. For example, dose-volume parameters for the heart are strongly correlated not only with other points along the heart DVH curve but are likely also correlated with dose-volume parameters in neighboring organs such as the lung. In this paper, we describe the problem of multicollinearity in accessible terms and discuss examples of violations of the multicollinearity assumption within the radiation oncology literature. Finally, we provide recommendations regarding best practices for identifying and managing multicollinearity in complex data sets.

Indexed as

Radiation OncologyHumansLungMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID37406827
PMCPMC12458133
OpenAlexW4382932933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.