Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37406441›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2023

Age-associated changes in the growth development of abdominal fat and their correlations with cecal gut microbiota in broiler chickens.

Xiaoying Liu, Chenxu Wang, Yumeng Wang, Chaohui Wang, Xi Sun, Yufei Zhu, Xiaojun Yang, Lixin Zhang, Yanli Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Potential for the development ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoying LiuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Chenxu WangCollege of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Yumeng WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Chaohui WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Xi SunCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Yufei ZhuShanxi Dayu Biological Functions Co., Ltd., Yuncheng, Shanxi, China; DAYU Bioengineering (Xi'an) Industrial Development Research Institute, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Xiaojun YangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Lixin ZhangCollege of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China.
Yanli LiuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China. Electronic address: liuyanli@nwsuaf.edu.cn.
Northwest A&F University · CNMicrobiology Institute of Shaanxi · CNNorth West Agriculture and Forestry University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excess abdominal fat is a common phenomenon in broiler chickens. Gut microbiota could regulate lipid metabolism through their effects on short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production. This study was conducted to investigate the potential relationship between abdominal fat development and cecal microorganism populations. Abdominal fat and cecum contents were collected at 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 d of age. The results showed that abdominal fat weight increased with age. The abdominal fat percentage was higher between 7 and 21 d of age than at 3 d (P < 0.05), and it increased again at 28 to 42 d (P < 0.05). Morphological analysis showed that adipocyte diameter and cross-sectional area (CSA) increased significantly after 14 d of age (P < 0.05). Moreover, gut microbiota analysis indicated that the Chao1 and Shannon indices were higher between 14 and 28 d than at 3 d of age (P < 0.05). Furthermore, LEfse analysis revealed that Faecalibacterium, Anaerotruncus, Anaeroplasma, Subdoligranulum, and Clostridium emerged to become dominant at 14 d. A greater abundance of Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Dehalobacterium, and Lactobacillus were determined at 28 d when compared with 14 d of age. Parabacteroides, Ochrobactrum, Lactobacillus, Blautia, Alistipes, Dehalobacterium, Odoribacter, and Suuterella were found to be predominant at 42 d. PICRUSt analysis revealed that amino acid metabolism, lipid metabolism, and terpenoids and polyketides metabolism were elevated at 14 d; the immune and digestive systems were significantly developed at 28 d. In addition, cecum propionic acid and butyric acid contents gradually increased (P < 0.05), while the isobutyric acid contents gradually decreased with advancing age (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis among SCFAs, differential genera and abdominal fat suggested that Coprobacillus, Shigella, and Butyricicoccus had negative correlations with propionic acid, butyric acid, and abdominal fat weight, but positive correlations with isobutyric acid. Isobutyric acid was identified as being negatively associated with abdominal fat weight, while the reverse was found for propionic acid and butyric acid. In conclusion, abdominal fat development is correlated with the emergence of specific microbes and d 14 may be a pivotal age for establishing this relationship.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteroidetesCecumChickensFatty Acids, VolatileIsobutyratesPropionatesFatty Acids, VolatileIsobutyratesisobutyric acidPropionatespropionic acid16S rRNAabdominal fatbroiler chickenscecal microbiotadevelopment stage

Identifiers

PMID37406441
PMCPMC10466292
OpenAlexW4382393569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.