Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37406118›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

Physically informed data-driven modeling of active nematics.

Matthew Golden, Roman O Grigoriev, Jyothishraj Nambisan, Alberto Fernandez-Nieves

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nonlinear memory in cell-division dynamics across species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Probing active nematics with in situ microfabricated elastic inclusions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew GoldenSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3788-5485
Roman O GrigorievSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6220-4701
Jyothishraj NambisanSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9808-959X
Alberto Fernandez-NievesDepartment of Condensed Matter Physics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona 08028, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1286-9809
Georgia Institute of Technology · USInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A continuum description is essential for understanding a variety of collective phenomena in active matter. However, building quantitative continuum models of active matter from first principles can be extremely challenging due to both the gaps in our knowledge and the complicated structure of nonlinear interactions. Here, we use a physically informed data-driven approach to construct a complete mathematical model of an active nematic from experimental data describing kinesin-driven microtubule bundles confined to an oil-water interface. We find that the structure of the model is similar to the Leslie-Ericksen and Beris-Edwards models, but there are appreciable and important differences. Rather unexpectedly, elastic effects are found to play no role in the experiments considered, with the dynamics controlled entirely by the balance between active stresses and friction stresses.

Identifiers

PMID37406118
PMCPMC10321743
OpenAlexW4383212980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.