Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37405995›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Exploring health care professionals' experiences and knowledge of woman-centred care in a university hospital.

Lucia Floris, Benedicte Michoud-Bertinotti, Begoña Martinez de Tejada, Sara de Oliveira, Riccardo Pfister, Stéphanie Parguey, Harriet E Thorn-Cole, Claire de Labrusse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucia FlorisHESAV School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Delémont, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0640-0780
Benedicte Michoud-BertinottiHESAV School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Delémont, Switzerland.
Begoña Martinez de TejadaGeneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sara de OliveiraGeneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Riccardo PfisterGeneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stéphanie PargueyGeneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva, Switzerland.
Harriet E Thorn-ColeHESAV School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Delémont, Switzerland.
Claire de LabrusseHESAV School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Delémont, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9885-5135

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inspired by the six quality-of-care goals developed by the Institute of Medicine, woman-centred care (WCC) as model of care is used in maternity services as it gives an emphasis on the woman as an individual and not her status as a patient. Bringing stronger attention to women's needs and values, is proven to have clear benefits for perinatal outcomes, but fails to be known or recognised by healthcare professionals' (HCPs) and implemented. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study aimed to explore HCPs definitions of WCC and identify the degree of agreement and knowledge regarding perinatal indicators when a WCC model of care is implemented. The quantitative part was carried using a self-administered questionnaire with perinatal indicators identified from the literature. Semi-structured interviews were realized using a purposive sample of 15 HCPs and an interview grid inspired by Leap's WCC model. The study was conducted in the maternity of a university hospital in French-speaking part of Switzerland. Out of 318 HCPs working with mothers and their newborns, 51% had already heard of WCC without being familiar with Leap's model. The HCPs were aware of the positive perinatal care outcomes when WCC was implemented: women's satisfaction (99.2%), health promotion (97.6%), HCP's job satisfaction (93.2%) and positive feelings about their work (85.6%), which were strongly emphasised in the interviews. The respondents reported institutional difficulties in implementing the model such as administrative overload and lack of time. The positive outcomes of WCC on spontaneous deliveries and improved neonatal adaptation were known by most HCPs (63.4% and 59.9%, respectively). However, fewer than half of the HCPs highlighted the model's positive effects on analgesia and episiotomies or its financial benefits. Knowledge of quality-of-care outcomes (i.e women's satisfaction, positive impact on practice…) was prevalent among most of HCPs. Without adhering to a common definition and without a specific model for consensus, most providers have integrated some aspects of WCC into their practice. However, specific perinatal indicators remain largely unknown, which may hinder the implementation of WCC.

Indexed as

MothersPerinatal CareChildFemaleHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornParturitionPregnancyQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID37405995
PMCPMC10321621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.