Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37405846›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Reconstructing the transport cycle in the sugar porter superfamily using coevolution-powered machine learning.

Darko Mitrovic, Sarah E McComas, Claudia Alleva, Marta Bonaccorsi, David Drew, Lucie Delemotte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Conformational Dynamics of NaJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  3. A two-step mechanism for sugar translocation.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Identification of New Key Players for Ferrous Iron Export in the Asymmetric Inner Gate of Human Ferroportin 1.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparative analysis of STP6 and STP10 unravels molecular selectivity in sugar transport proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Diversity, expression, and structural modeling of sugar transporters inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Peripheral positions encode transport specificity in the small multidrug resistance exporters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Darko MitrovicDepartment of Applied Physics, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3219-1062
Sarah E McComasDepartment of Applied Physics, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Claudia AllevaDepartment of Applied Physics, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8595-9250
Marta BonaccorsiDepartment of Applied Physics, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
David DrewDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8866-6349
Lucie DelemotteDepartment of Applied Physics, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0828-3899
Stockholm University · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugar porters (SPs) represent the largest group of secondary-active transporters. Some members, such as the glucose transporters (GLUTs), are well known for their role in maintaining blood glucose homeostasis in mammals, with their expression upregulated in many types of cancers. Because only a few sugar porter structures have been determined, mechanistic models have been constructed by piecing together structural states of distantly related proteins. Current GLUT transport models are predominantly descriptive and oversimplified. Here, we have combined coevolution analysis and comparative modeling, to predict structures of the entire sugar porter superfamily in each state of the transport cycle. We have analyzed the state-specific contacts inferred from coevolving residue pairs and shown how this information can be used to rapidly generate free-energy landscapes consistent with experimental estimates, as illustrated here for the mammalian fructose transporter GLUT5. By comparing many different sugar porter models and scrutinizing their sequence, we have been able to define the molecular determinants of the transport cycle, which are conserved throughout the sugar porter superfamily. We have also been able to highlight differences leading to the emergence of proton-coupling, validating, and extending the previously proposed latch mechanism. Our computational approach is transferable to any transporter, and to other protein families in general.

Indexed as

GlucoseSugarsAnimalsBiological TransportGlucose Transport Proteins, FacilitativeMammalsMembrane Transport ProteinsGlucoseGlucose Transport Proteins, FacilitativeMembrane Transport ProteinsSugarsmembrane proteinmolecular biophysicsmolecular dynamics simulationsmolecular modelingnonestructural biologystructure predictiontransporter

Identifiers

PMID37405846
PMCPMC10322152
OpenAlexW4383186916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.