Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37405829›Full record

Trial reporteLife2023

Presenting a sham treatment as personalised increases the placebo effect in a randomised controlled trial.

Dasha A Sandra, Jay A Olson, Ellen J Langer, Mathieu Roy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06980090 (Neural Mechanisms of Interpersonal Expectations on Negative Affect), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06980090 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Neural Mechanisms of Interpersonal Expectations on Negative Affect

TypeinterventionalSponsorTrustees of Dartmouth CollegeRan2025 to 2028Enrolled196ConditionsNegative Affectivity, Non-invasive Brain Stimulation, Placebo Effect, ExpectationsArmsSession A: Positive Placebo + Active tTIS, Session B: Positive Placebo + Sham tTIS, Session C: Negative Placebo + Active tTIS, Session D: Negative Placebo + Sham tTIS, Session E: On-Placebo + Sham tTIS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Illness Expectations and Asthma Symptoms: A 6-Month Longitudinal Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dasha A SandraIntegrated Program in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9930-2807
Jay A OlsonDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1161-5209
Ellen J LangerDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States.
Mathieu RoyDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3335-445X
Harvard University · USMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Tailoring interventions to patient subgroups can improve intervention outcomes for various conditions. However, it is unclear how much of this improvement is due to the pharmacological personalisation versus the non-specific effects of the contextual factors involved in the tailoring process, such as the therapeutic interaction. Here, we tested whether presenting a (placebo) analgesia machine as personalised would improve its effectiveness. Methods: We recruited 102 adults in two samples ( Results: Participants told that the machine was personalised reported more relief in pain intensity than the control group in both the feasibility study (standardised Conclusions: We present some of the first evidence that framing a sham treatment as personalised increases its effectiveness. Our findings could potentially improve the methodology of precision medicine research and inform practice. Funding: This study was funded by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council (93188) and Genome Québec (95747).

Indexed as

Pain ManagementPlacebo EffectAdultDouble-Blind MethodHumansPaincontextual factorsexpectationhumanmedicineneurosciencepainpersonalised medicineplaceboprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID37405829
PMCPMC10325710
OpenAlexW4383186935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.